OK. I apologise for presuming she is a slut when I didn't know how the pill works. I just like to be dramatic and throw around wild accusations. I am sorry.
Well to be fair, the first page was concerned with that because the OP appears to address that one particular argument, rather than the concerns that were purely or at least primarily medical in nature. Let's try to keep focused on addressing the arguments themselves, rather than turning this into another us v them debate and presuming that every argument from one side is being put forth by everyone on that side.
Well, those reproductive health concerns are only there because of the recreation they are choosing to pursue. I don't believe that my gender changes that fact.
Well that is exactly how things appeared. At least until Mr. Limbaugh stepped in, but we'll get to that...
Yes, Rush handed this very poorly and he seems to have flipped the public's perspective on this girl from being a whore to being a poor victimised college girl. When you're a public figure you have to watch your mouth.
I don't care.
Well I'm certainly not coming from an anti-Obamacare perspective, I love my NHS and hate how the current government is dismantling it. As for it being an assault on religious freedom, I do not believe that Obama meant it to be some sort of wicked plot to submit the church to the state. But I think that a side effect of this policy is that it does infringe on peoples' freedom of conscience without sufficient reason.
Bookmarks