Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Fall of the Samurai PC Gamer review

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Grand Patron's Banner Bearer Senior Member Peasant Phill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somewhere relatively safe, behind some one else, preferably at the back
    Posts
    2,953
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Fall of the Samurai PC Gamer review

    Quote Originally Posted by Graphic View Post
    ... Complaining that the factions use the same modern units is weird too since a modern late 19th century unit is a guy in an ironed uniform with a rifle. Maybe he wants ninja riflemen? Or geisha artillery? That'd be rad, right?
    Diverse units makes for better replayability though and something I would find really great. The small campaign map doesn't lend itself to that though
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone
    Someone has to watch over the wheat.
    Quote Originally Posted by TinCow
    We've made our walls sufficiently thick that we don't even hear the wet thuds of them bashing their brains against the outer wall and falling as lifeless corpses into our bottomless moat.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Fall of the Samurai PC Gamer review

    I wouldn't mind them exaggerating a bit the advantages of certain factions to create more unique units. At the least, it could promote a bit of different gameplay across factions. The bonuses in Shogun 2 didn't go far enough for most factions. They tried something similar with the line infantry in Empire, but aside from Austria's line infantry, the differences weren't big enough to make a noticeable impact.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member Graphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Nevada, U.S.
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Fall of the Samurai PC Gamer review

    Quote Originally Posted by Love Squeezin's View Post
    Diverse units makes for better replayability though and something I would find really great. The small campaign map doesn't lend itself to that though
    I agree but its simply the nature of the time and place, so it seems a bit unfair to penalize the game for it. It'd be like complaining that a game called "1930s German Tanks" only had German tanks from the 1930s. IMO a review should judge game for what it is, not for what the reviewer wishes it was.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO