A History of Violence [Concluded]

[Riedquat]

What? The Tuuvi who is already dead? You're not helping. {IGNORE}

You neither! At least he is giving a reason, wrong and crazy but a reason after all...

What is your reason for going after Nightbringer in two consecutive days? uh?

[LazyMcCrow]

You neither! At least he is giving a reason, wrong and crazy but a reason after all...

What is your reason for going after Nightbringer in two consecutive days? uh?

Three reasons:
1) Its personal: Nightbringer forced me into a tie position to fight Monty day 1. You say OMGUS? I say mmmmwhadeva: considering I was one of the subjects of the only, but awesomely disturbing write-up, my vote for NB is a semi-serious kneejerk for the joke he made about me being a murderer after Monty was 'lynched'
2) Despite the attempt yesterday to put pressure on someone who has been 'exciteable' at the start of a game, the attempt was over run by the nonsense wagon on Kagemusha.
3) He has a fake beard.

[Arjos]

Vote: Seon

He's hopping wherever he can...

[Seon]

ATPG knows that whoever votes for ATPG is scummy, so I'll let him be.

Unvote. Vote: Arjos Arjos is a good player. He avoided everyone's attention back in Batman Arkham Asylum. He has to know that voting ATPG is scummy and since ATPG voted for me, he jumped on me instantly. Ergo, he's a mafiosi.

[Arjos]

I never knew how to handle lurkers...
Kage's version feels ok to me, so I don't have any case on ATPG...

Everyone except you and atheotes said how bogus that was, so it makes me think that either of you was looking for an easy wagon...

[Riedquat]

Three reasons:
1) Its personal: Nightbringer forced me into a tie position to fight Monty day 1. You say OMGUS? I say mmmmwhadeva: considering I was one of the subjects of the only, but awesomely disturbing write-up, my vote for NB is a semi-serious kneejerk for the joke he made about me being a murderer after Monty was 'lynched'
2) Despite the attempt yesterday to put pressure on someone who has been 'exciteable' at the start of a game, the attempt was over run by the nonsense wagon on Kagemusha.
3) He has a fake beard.

Good reasons.

Now would be nice to know BSmith reasons too... but for the moment I need to say I'm finding Seon's behaviour very very suspicious...

He was one of the first to point his fingers to WE, then jumped to me when I mentioned WE would know better if he were mafia, didn't WE reminder us he was in the same boat with Seon about being woged? That night WE got killed... Who gets lynched then? Kage, the one saying lets go after WE and... who would follow if WE were dead as it was the case?

Decomposing hand of suspicion: Seon

[DaveShack]

Vote: Seon this case seems better than the others.

[Visor]

considering I was one of the subjects of the only, but awesomely disturbing write-up,

There were two writeups.

But I'm glad you liked them. I should be able to get around to some of the others in a few hours after my work is done, then finally, I can go to sleep before midnight for the first time in a week.

[LazyMcCrow]

There were two writeups.

Oh yeah - I'd managed to blank that second more gruesome one.

But I'm glad you liked them. I should be able to get around to some of the others in a few hours after my work is done, then finally, I can go to sleep before midnight for the first time in a week.

[BSmith]

Good reasons.

Now would be nice to know BSmith reasons too...

Along with Lazy’s #2 above, Nightbringer was one of two players that added a second vote on someone on D1. When he made this vote it put Lazy in the lead for the kill he was, in essence, deciding who to kill on D1. Tuuvi was the other player that did this (tied it though), but he is dead now.

His votes have also been pretty light on any kind of real reason, and he goes out of his way to explain his vote on splitpersonality as a purely defensive move. It may well have been, but we get that. There really is no need to explain that you want to save yourself unless you feel you have to justify your voting for a known (to you anyway) innocent.

[Nightbringer]

Along with Lazy’s #2 above, Nightbringer was one of two players that added a second vote on someone on D1. When he made this vote it put Lazy in the lead for the kill he was, in essence, deciding who to kill on D1. Tuuvi was the other player that did this (tied it though), but he is dead now.

His votes have also been pretty light on any kind of real reason, and he goes out of his way to explain his vote on splitpersonality as a purely defensive move. It may well have been, but we get that. There really is no need to explain that you want to save yourself unless you feel you have to justify your voting for a known (to you anyway) innocent.

In response to his, the first point is quite valid, although on day 1 I think it is hard to make anything of votes. As to #2, I always over-explain things and make myself look scummy.

[White_eyes:D]

I like how the Mafia are killing off everyone I suspected was scum. Next on the list is...Askthepizzaguy.

He needs to be lynched before the end if he is not killed.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I like how the Mafia are killing off everyone I suspected was scum. Next on the list is...Askthepizzaguy.

He needs to be lynched before the end if he is not killed.

O mafia, please kill me so I can prove White_eyes' instincts about me are dead wrong for the 75th time in a row. That's all I ask.

White_eyes, do you know what the definition of insanity is?

[White_eyes:D]

If your not scum, your trying a little too hard to convince me otherwise.

Pizzaguy, do you know what the definition of paranoia is, because why should my comment matter to a mafia who is going out of his way to kill lynchbait?

[SalmonSoil]

Vote: Arjos

Seon looks pretty guilty, but he's essentially lynched anyway, however this way if we're wrong and he's right I can act like I knew all along.