The fact that he's been suspended three times is well known. The BS he spouted on his Twatter account is also well known. Hell even one of your (horrible) op-ed pieces referenced this, the one that indicated I'm clearly a racist for not seeing this as representative of race issues in the US.
Because I don't have any opinion on those yet? Because I haven't read anything that I think is "solid" that gives me enough of an impression to have an opinion? Shocking, isn't it.You have nothing to say, apparently, about the law, the circumstances, the shooter, the police or the prosecutor.
Can't help it others, like you, willfully ignore parts of what I've said or willfully misrepresent and "spin" other things. This all works both ways. You have your panties in a huge wad that I've supposedly "condemned" the alleged victim already, I've stated multiple times I'm undecided on that. I find it equally annoying that you as well as many others have already indicated he is a "victim" in the overall situation, because that has yet to be established. If it turns out that he instigated the fight and gave Zimmerman cause to use lethal force, then victim he ain't.The sole object of your scorn is the guy who did the dying. And you're shocked, shocked that anyone could interpret that as anything but a cool, logical evaluation of the case. How dare they? The cheek! The nerve!
Bookmarks