Obamacare Going Down?

[a completely inoffensive name]

Originalism vs living, they can't both be right.

Why not? Why can't we accept a degree of validity from both and simply pick from either side what is most prudent at the time?

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Why not? Why can't we accept a degree of validity from both and simply pick from either side what is most prudent at the time?

You aren't arguing for both you're arguing for living.

edit: which means I contradicted myself...your way of doing things would allow for being partisan, unlike strict originalism would would require the judge to stick to his method even if he didn't like the results politically.

[a completely inoffensive name]

You aren't arguing for both you're arguing for living.

Then living is correct.