You can, but should you? I'm not going to say other countries didn't use Longbows - I"m sure they did, and the concept is pretty simple to understand - but I'm gonna post this again;
I think if good Longbows were easy enough to replicate, then the rest of Europe would have been using them too, right? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read that Yew was a northern wood, and almost extinct in their area because of the English "farming them" for bows. If it was so easy to create a good Longbow like the English, I imagine that would have spread rapidly around Europe just like the firearm and cannons did.Originally Posted by wiki
But then again, I'm not an archer/bowyer, so I couldn't really say one way or the other. I'm inclined to think it was not as easy as it sounds.
Also, the fact that they didn't spread rapidly around Europe like guns, and mostly stayed in English hands, kind of proves that other countries perceived them as the situational weapon that they were, and not necessarily a game-breaking win whenever they fought in a battle - the few battles having been pointed out where a Longbow contributed heavily notwithstanding.
Bookmarks