Mini Game: Vanilla Game 6 [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

I don't.

[LazyMcCrow]

I assume atheotes Day-killed himself because he thought he would be taking a scum down with him.

[atheotes]

I don't.

were you even the lead candidate when i killed myself? I did so early enough giving you a chance to save yourself!

[LazyMcCrow]

well. possibly my last contribution to the thread before a busy weekend: I vote: Ishmael I shall try to look in sporadically.

[Ishmael]

Finally get a chance to check in here, and I don't see anything to change my planned vote.

vote: Lazy McCrow

I will freely admit that your strange voting pattern could just be carelessness on your part. However, the 'aura' after the D1 no lynch and its zombiefication of Daveshack/killing of Nightbringer, coupled with the fact we know there will be some unconventional roles, makes me feel that it's too much of a risk not to lynch you.

[BSmith]

vote: Arjos What’s so scummy about voting to save myself? I am the one person I know for sure is innocent. The Monty vote was a good option. I was leaning more towards atheotes being innocent, and took the chance that perhaps Monty was not based on how hard he was pushing the lynch. Hind sight is 20/20 though, and it was a bad move. But even then, as I said earlier – if we had to lose a townie, Monty was the best choice as he freely admitted he had already used his ability and was nothing more than a vanilla townie.

I saw three possibilities:

1. Lynch a scumbag .
2. Lynch a townie with a useful ability.
3. Lynch a townie with no ability.

I was naturally hoping for option 1, but the fallback was option 3. Option 2 was the worst possible outcome.

[SalmonSoil]

Lynch: LazyMcCrow

Given Monty's innocence I see no reason not to trust the information he gave us. This is that the third party uses no lynches to fuel its victory conditions in someway. This makes you the most likely candidate for being the third party.

[Visor]

Alright. Salmon's vote is invalid as it is after the deadline.

Tallying, calculating, be back soon.

[Arjos]

What’s so scummy about voting to save myself?

As you made quite clear, all your scenarios had another lynch (most of all Monty was clearing a victim and didn't lie about his role), while you could have simply abstained and still save yourself: to me that's not survival alone, that's getting rid of as many people as possible too...

Now you are making this weak distraction about the players' numbers...

Vote: BSmith

[Ishmael]

vote: Lazy McCrow

No change in my reasoning since yesterday, although there's the added mystery as to how you managed to survive with a lead in the lynch tally. It seems to fit with the Communist gaining power through no lynches.