what does this comment even have to do with what has been said...?
according to HoreTores logic if there is no scientific proof for it something does not exist... thats the implication of his comment:
there is no scientific proof of god, thus god does not exist.
belief in this case has nothing to do with it. (although believing can obviously also mean believing that something does not exist... and so we are nothing further.)
anyway i find it funny that this entire heated discussion is being held with vocabulary that nobody even agrees upon and with many concepts which do not have a satisfying definition that can stand up against "reasonable" critique.
Bookmarks