No, while it's not a wise thing to allow, it does not fit the defintion of "corrupt". I don't see how you could view is at such unless you also think that the speaker of the American HoR is corrupt ex officio (obvious setup for a snarky remark about politicians, I know)
That's like, your opinion. And not relevant for what we were discussing. Nice try though, finding a way out of admitting you're wrong.
This calls for a victory dance:
![]()
Bookmarks