Results 1 to 30 of 179

Thread: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    i am sorry but your know even getting off topic to try to find fault, i said schools [with multiple references in earlier post] teach that c02 release in air is a pollutant, deny all you will but you just look silly.
    You have to be a troll, or there is something wrong that makes me feel very sad for you.

    You said schools don't mention the positives of carbon dioxide, that they only call it a pollutant. HoreTore says that that statement is not true because schools teach photosynthesis which involves carbon dioxide. You then claim that he is saying something else entirely different. That somehow he made the claim that schools don't call carbon dioxide a pollutant. But that wasn't what he said, he said schools do show how vital it is to the environment as well.

    And this is all from three posts within an hour of each other. I'm sorry moderators, but you want civil discourse towards a conspiracy-tard with a memory of a goldfish?

    Members thankful for this post (2):



  2. #2

    Default Re: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    As they should, seeing as co2 is a pollutant.

    lol

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    You have to be a troll, or there is something wrong that makes me feel very sad for you.

    You said schools don't mention the positives of carbon dioxide, that they only call it a pollutant. HoreTore says that that statement is not true because schools teach photosynthesis which involves carbon dioxide. You then claim that he is saying something else entirely different. That somehow he made the claim that schools don't call carbon dioxide a pollutant. But that wasn't what he said, he said schools do show how vital it is to the environment as well.

    And this is all from three posts within an hour of each other. I'm sorry moderators, but you want civil discourse towards a conspiracy-tard with a memory of a goldfish?

    when referring to global warming and environmental issues they dont teach photosynthesis, there are many examples given before, if people deny this i dont care, i am referring to radical environmentalist only. So apretley it is your memory of my post/op/position that is in need of some fixing. Or you could show were i said schools dont teach photosynthesis, of course than you would just follow in the straw man HoreTore has created to try and find any fault in my op.
    Last edited by total relism; 04-09-2013 at 11:50.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  3. #3
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    lol
    That response is the best way I can think of to show off your ignorance. Thank you.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO