[Thureophoroi] How would you use them?

[moonburn]

you answered your own question

the need for more flexibility after facing the kelts forced the hellenes to counter the kelts with their own heavy armed javelin throwing unit wich was also fast and flexible

in many ways i use the peltastai in the same way as i use my thureporoi in the end it´s mainly a matter of if you prefer spear or sword (altough in a few ambush scenarios peltastai skirmish hability can be more usefull and less usefull in a field batle against light or medium cavalry)

[Basileus_ton_Basileon]

Personally I use them as my 'grunt' infantry. Jack of all trades, they are spread throughout my battle lines, providing the bulk of my forces. In the centre, they would provide the main battle line; in the flanks they would support the specialist units and cavalry (in fact, I find them very useful in screening cavalry). Behind them is where I place other heavier infantry as reserves.

[QuintusSertorius]

you answered your own question

the need for more flexibility after facing the kelts forced the hellenes to counter the kelts with their own heavy armed javelin throwing unit wich was also fast and flexible

in many ways i use the peltastai in the same way as i use my thureporoi in the end it´s mainly a matter of if you prefer spear or sword (altough in a few ambush scenarios peltastai skirmish hability can be more usefull and less usefull in a field batle against light or medium cavalry)

So in a way, that style of unit is pretty ideal if you're going to be fighting Keltoi? Assuming they're going to have lots of javelin-throwers and good cavalry.

Personally I use them as my 'grunt' infantry. Jack of all trades, they are spread throughout my battle lines, providing the bulk of my forces. In the centre, they would provide the main battle line; in the flanks they would support the specialist units and cavalry (in fact, I find them very useful in screening cavalry). Behind them is where I place other heavier infantry as reserves.

Was that the way they were used by the likes of the Seleukids and Pergamon?

Are they solid enough to be front-liners against Kelts? I have a feeling that short of hiring a lot of mercenaries, hoplite-style infantry would be hard to come by. And besides, you probably want the centre of your line to be people you trust at least some.

[Ca Putt]

Historically The EB-Thureophoroi are about as heavy as Thureophoroi would get. The sources are not quite clear about this but it suffices to say that thureophoroi(surprisingly easy to write once you get used to it^^) are often depicted without any Body armour.

So in a way, that style of unit is pretty ideal if you're going to be fighting Keltoi? Assuming they're going to have lots of javelin-throwers and good cavalry.

Well I would not call them direct "Counters" to celtic troops but If you don't have a Counter imitating your enemies fighting style is a valid choice. Thus If you are attacked by spearmen and your archers are crap you might aswell just Train better spearmen^^

If I recall correctly Ts were used a) to screen flanking troops such as Peltastai, cavalry or special troops, b) conduct Skirmishes against both Skirmishers and Heavy troops, being able to choose how to engage them c) Flank less mobile line troops themselves and d) to augment the Formation where needed.

They don't seem to be used as real line troops in Major battles and I don't think the "Greeks" used the Germanic/Roman System of the light meatshield during the Hellenistic period. They would probably prefer to use native troops such as Machimoi for those tasks ;)

[moonburn]

when i started playing i just had 12 in each army and used the 3 lines sistem let them deplet their javelins throw them into the fray once they get tired or very tired pull them back behinde the 3rd line and move in the 2nd one

also works wonders in defense and their vast amount of javelins does make a serious dent on enemies with bellow average armour (3 lines add in peltastai or archers beteween the lines to increase the shock value ) imagine as you advance against them the amounts of javelins rainning down on you increasing most troops will be near breaking point at that stage so if you use it near a patch of trees imagine being surrounded by peltastai placing themselfs behinde you and hitting you on the back (the patch of trees ofc serves for cover to let the enemies go by without noticing your peltastai)

[Basileus_ton_Basileon]

Was that the way they were used by the likes of the Seleukids and Pergamon?

Are they solid enough to be front-liners against Kelts? I have a feeling that short of hiring a lot of mercenaries, hoplite-style infantry would be hard to come by. And besides, you probably want the centre of your line to be people you trust at least some.

As Ca Putt have mentioned, EB Thureophoroi are on the heavier end of the spectrum. I'd say the more experienced, better armed, thureophoros would take the centre (with the real heavy infantry right behind them), while the (lighter armed) raw recruits would support the specialists and cavalry in the flanks (behind them).

I think it would be a good time to mention that the term thureophoroi literally meant 'door-holder', likely a generic term for infantry heavier than peltastai that uses the keltoi shield. AFAIK, the EB team plans to replace them with the Euzonoi in EBII, as well as other units.

[Arjos]

Thureophoroi offered versatility on the field, they could react much faster than Phalangitai or Hoplitai, since they didn't require a solid formation...
They would operate on the flanks, in tandem with lighter Psiloi and cavalry, to screen the main infantry and impede flanking manouvers by the enemy. They were employed on rough terrains for example...
Theirs wasn't exactly a "counter to Keltoi", that is they weren't intented to go head to head with them and defeat them, but rather the adoption of the Keltic fast and independent infrantryman. Also the very Keltoi newcomers, more often than not, fought as Thureophoroi. The Aitolioi, who already had a tradition for individualistic shock combat, quickly adopted it too. These particular soldiers eventually grew into the Thorakitai, to cover the need of more close quarter action for the Thureophoroi. And later (1st cent BCE) in Syria, Mikra Asia and Aigyptos, the greater influence of Keltic settlers evolved the corp further into Spathaphoroi...

To sum it up, the Thureophoroi offered assistance on the flanks and quick tactical response. Depending on the soldiers' warfare tradition and/or lack of heavier contingents, they also grew into Thorakitai for prolonged melee, something the Thureophoroi could not do.

As for examples there are the Kappadokioi or Libyes (note the choice of people: highlanders and tribesmen, used to fight in loose formations and independently) being armed as Keltoi during the campaigns of Antiochos III, they were deployed next to the Phalangitai. In the case of Pergamon, the Mysioi and most likely the pastoral settlers from the Makedonian highlands fought as Thureophoroi/Thorakitai. Hellenistic mentality to battle formations, didn't take much into consideration the concept of reserves (something that Alexandros instead used), but envisioned an unbreakable, yet cumbersome line, whose only weakness were the flanks and that's where versatility was needed to protect it...

[Ca Putt]

Are you sure that they will replace the Thureophoroi with Euzonoi? I had the feeling that unlike the rather prominent Thureophoroi the Euzonoi is only seldom mentioned in the sources. Thus the EB team wanted to supplement the Hellenistic armies with the latter. Probably not including both in every hellenic faction. If EB2 retains the "High-end-Thureophoroi" there is a viable place for the euzonoi, seeing as these are significantly lighter than the "door-bearers".

[Basileus_ton_Basileon]

I think they're replacing the thureophoroi with more than one unit.

Door-bearers of different sorts!