Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 105

Thread: Special Forces - who is the best?

  1. #31
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    They do have their uses, but the typical hero worship is undeserved, especially Hollywood crap in which they're represented as superhuman. Throw them behind enemy lines with two nails and a piece of rope and they'll build tanks, helicopters, airplanes and a makeshift base. After that they'll destroy ten enemy divisions, stop a nuclear warhead from launching, capture a dictator and be home for lunch. At least one of them will then quit the army and devote his life to his girlfriend who he dumped just prior to the mission. At least until the sequel in which he will again be recruited and he won't be able to refuse because of his sense of duty.

    In the case of Osama mission you mentioned, think about what they really did - they crossed into another country illegally (creating a diplomatic incident) and performed an assassination (creating another diplomatic incident). The effect - Bin Laden is now dead, hurrah!!! Unfortunately, the terrorist organization is still alive and well and it falls again to the grunts on the ground to deal with it in the only way possible, by cutting the funding and taking away their manpower and support, either by direct combat or by winning hearts and minds of the population.

  2. #32
    Strategist and Storyteller Senior Member Myth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,921

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian View Post
    They do have their uses, but the typical hero worship is undeserved, especially Hollywood crap in which they're represented as superhuman. Throw them behind enemy lines with two nails and a piece of rope and they'll build tanks, helicopters, airplanes and a makeshift base. After that they'll destroy ten enemy divisions, stop a nuclear warhead from launching, capture a dictator and be home for lunch. At least one of them will then quit the army and devote his life to his girlfriend who he dumped just prior to the mission. At least until the sequel in which he will again be recruited and he won't be able to refuse because of his sense of duty.

    In the case of Osama mission you mentioned, think about what they really did - they crossed into another country illegally (creating a diplomatic incident) and performed an assassination (creating another diplomatic incident). The effect - Bin Laden is now dead, hurrah!!! Unfortunately, the terrorist organization is still alive and well and it falls again to the grunts on the ground to deal with it in the only way possible, by cutting the funding and taking away their manpower and support, either by direct combat or by winning hearts and minds of the population.
    I daresay the bolded part is taken care of by Special Forces. The Green Berets do exactly this, I posted it once and Husar also did. The Rangers and Green Berets are the ones who handle this. You can't fight a war on terror (it's a stupid name but bear with me) with tanks and grunts. The movies are stupid yes, but the OP on Osama achieved what it was supposed to do. Diplomatic incidents don't matter much to a country as powerful as the USA, while eliminating this rogue CIA trained agent was a priority. The pure profit in public opinion was worth it. My point was not whether it was a good idea or not to kill Osama or what it achieved, but when presented with the need to carry out such an operation you have to assign it to someone. Who is that someone if not the Special Forces units?
    The art of war, then, is governed by five constant
    factors, to be taken into account in one's deliberations,
    when seeking to determine the conditions obtaining in the field.

    These are: (1) The Moral Law; (2) Heaven; (3) Earth;
    (4) The Commander; (5) Method and discipline.
    Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
    Like totalwar.org on Facebook!

  3. #33
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Myth View Post
    Take the elimination of Osama for example. Did that not boost morale through the roof? Whom would you entrust such an op to if you were in a position to make that decision?
    The SAC perhaps?

    Everybody loves to watch a carpet(/nuclear) bombing except from directly below.

    Oh and, the Delta Force are Green Berets because Green Berets is not a unit but an umbrella term for people who used to wear....green berets....which were only worn by special operators. There was a bit of a ruckus lately when other US army units got black berets or something because berets alone were usually reserved to somewhat special people who kill their enemies in especially effective ways.
    It was seen as an attempt to boost the morale of common throwaway soldiers that could be to the detriment of the more sophisticated princesses of death who had earned their berets through merit.

    The thing about berets is that when you stab someone from behind you're a despicable coward but when you do it wearing a ghilly suit and a beret, then you're awesome. That's why berets should only be given to people who earned them through merit because one has to earn the right not to be a coward.
    Last edited by Husar; 02-28-2014 at 11:01.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  4. #34
    Master of useless knowledge Senior Member Kitten Shooting Champion, Eskiv Champion Ironside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    If two SF teams meets, who win? The defender, always the defender. Why?

    Because even if the attacker wins, they failed their mission. All SF teams are close enough that the winning team will always take losses and be delayed enough that any close reinforcements will have time to respond.

    And if you're talking about winning the hearts and minds of the population, the most important thing is attitude. Troops that feel genuine and caring is going to do much better than those with a strict military protocol attitude.
    We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?

    Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
    Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
    TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED

  5. #35
    Senior Member Senior Member Brenus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Wokingham
    Posts
    3,523

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    The problem is your view of Special Forces is actually wrong. Special Forces are not going behind enemy lines in a killing 1000 a day. The Special Forces dropped from 3000 metres, buried themselves and report, undetected, what they see. For one sniper killing one person, the job of hundreds of teams is spying, and to do that, you avoid to kill at all cost as, for unknown reason, it may alarm the enemies.
    I interviewed one of this “special” for my Doctorate on the French Indochina War. He was the LO of the Roger Vandenberghe’s commando, and he just confirm it: Infiltration, location on map, relay to artillery and job done.

    Like the paratroopers, the Special Forces are Infantry on Amphetamine. Movies don’t help in understanding this.

    The Special Forces have the same effect and for the same reason than a killer going in a cinema and killing 50 unarmed persons. They are ready; they are equipped, when the others are not. The difference of course is in war that the best way to do it: by night, fog and rain, when the enemies are in pyjamas and sleeping (or sleepy, cursing the weather, waiting to go back in a warmish barracks out of the weather).
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire.

    "I've been in few famous last stands, lad, and they're butcher shops. That's what Blouse's leading you into, mark my words. What'll you lot do then? We've had a few scuffles, but that's not war. Think you'll be man enough to stand, when the metal meets the meat?"
    "You did, sarge", said Polly." You said you were in few last stands."
    "Yeah, lad. But I was holding the metal"
    Sergeant Major Jackrum 10th Light Foot Infantery Regiment "Inns-and-Out"

    Members thankful for this post (4):



  6. #36
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Marinejegerkommdandoen (MJK) is the best special forces in the world, hands down.
    Status Emeritus

  7. #37
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ironside View Post
    If two SF teams meets, who win? The defender, always the defender. Why?

    Because even if the attacker wins, they failed their mission. All SF teams are close enough that the winning team will always take losses and be delayed enough that any close reinforcements will have time to respond.

    And if you're talking about winning the hearts and minds of the population, the most important thing is attitude. Troops that feel genuine and caring is going to do much better than those with a strict military protocol attitude.
    I do not think Spetsnaz would take losses when the Delta Force are defending their barn:



    Around 1:45 you can see a typical Marinejegerkommdandoen defensive position and what Spetsnaz would do to it.
    600m is beyond the effective range of common Delta Force, SAS and SASR weaponry.

    I also forgot that some special forces were not mentioned here, either because they do not send enough propaganda material to the military channel or because they are clearly not worth mentioning:

    Germany: KSK - became really famous when some of them made a photograph of themselves next to a pile of bones from Afghans they had killed.
    Kampfschwimmer - German Navy SEALS equivalent, even the DDR had such a special forces group:



    Cuba: Desembarco de Granma - no idea what they have to do with your grandma

    France: BSFT:



    GCP-CRAP - probably not as bad as the name suggests:



    Commandos Marine

    Somalia: PIRATES - mostly known for their ability to board ships completely unnoticed, minor deficits in direct combat:



    There is also a list sorted by countries on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...l_forces_units


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  8. #38
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    Around 1:45 you can see a typical Marinejegerkommdandoen defensive position and what Spetsnaz would do to it.
    Truth is... Spetsnaz would never know if MJK was close by. Countless examples for this has been confirmed in "joint" exercises. Especially the Brits and the Americans.
    Status Emeritus

  9. #39
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Truth is... Spetsnaz would never know if MJK was close by. Countless examples for this has been confirmed in "joint" exercises. Especially the Brits and the Americans.
    I've said numerous times now that Spetsnaz are far superior to Americans and Brits, you cannot compare them. Americans also have "Marines" who can't swim according to anecdotal evidence from a trustworthy .org member...


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  10. #40
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brenus View Post
    The problem is your view of Special Forces is actually wrong. Special Forces are not going behind enemy lines in a killing 1000 a day. The Special Forces dropped from 3000 metres, buried themselves and report, undetected, what they see. For one sniper killing one person, the job of hundreds of teams is spying, and to do that, you avoid to kill at all cost as, for unknown reason, it may alarm the enemies.
    I interviewed one of this “special” for my Doctorate on the French Indochina War. He was the LO of the Roger Vandenberghe’s commando, and he just confirm it: Infiltration, location on map, relay to artillery and job done.

    Like the paratroopers, the Special Forces are Infantry on Amphetamine. Movies don’t help in understanding this.

    The Special Forces have the same effect and for the same reason than a killer going in a cinema and killing 50 unarmed persons. They are ready; they are equipped, when the others are not. The difference of course is in war that the best way to do it: by night, fog and rain, when the enemies are in pyjamas and sleeping (or sleepy, cursing the weather, waiting to go back in a warmish barracks out of the weather).
    Why do you bring sanity to this madness? If you continue it's gonna stop being a peeing contest...

    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    I do not think Spetsnaz would take losses when the Delta Force are defending their barn:
    And, as every serious military strategist knows, if you lose the barn, you've lost the war.
    Last edited by Sarmatian; 02-28-2014 at 13:20.

    Members thankful for this post (2):



  11. #41
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian View Post
    Why do you bring sanity to this madness? If you continue it's gonna stop being a peeing contest...
    What? All my posts are carefully crafted and well-reasoned and I even forgot to mention the Special Forces of my own country at first.
    Just because some people cannot hold back from mentioning the overglorified special forces from their own monkeysphere that does not mean the entire thread is a urination contest.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian View Post
    And, as every serious military strategist knows, if you lose the barn, you've lost the war.
    Indeed, ask the French about the Maginot line or the Belgians about losing their frontline barns in 1940.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  12. #42

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Marinejegerkommdandoen (MJK) is the best special forces in the world, hands down.
    I see your Special Norses and raise you...

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  13. #43
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    My vote would have to go to the Russians...

    Spetnaz come through a training regiment completely different to western ones. They also have at least as much practical experience as the USAnians.

    The Alpha Team have made it there through warfare within the Russian army, not training.

    Member thankful for this post:

    Husar 


  14. #44
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    I've said numerous times now that Spetsnaz are far superior to Americans and Brits, you cannot compare them. Americans also have "Marines" who can't swim according to anecdotal evidence from a trustworthy .org member...
    That video you claim is Spetsnaz looks like ordinary troops on a Sunday trip compared to:
    Status Emeritus

  15. #45
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    That video you claim is Spetsnaz looks like ordinary troops on a Sunday trip compared to:
    Every Hollywood director can show off like that with a bunch of spoiled millionaire actors. Not to forget that the rap is from America, Spetsnaz can make their own rap.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  16. #46
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    Every Hollywood director can show off like that with a bunch of spoiled millionaire actors. Not to forget that the rap is from America, Spetsnaz can make their own rap.
    Spoiled actors would never allow their face to be covered up for more than a few seconds in any film. Which incidentally in the Spetznas film, seems not to be an issue. I suspect the Spasmnaz film are filled with spoiled but poor actors (indicated by their horrible fake costumes and toy guns).
    Last edited by Sigurd; 02-28-2014 at 15:30.
    Status Emeritus

  17. #47
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Spoiled actors would never allow their face to be covered up for more than a few seconds in any film. Which incidentally in the Spetznas film, seems not to be an issue. I suspect the Spasmnaz film are filled with spoiled but poor actors (indicated by their horrible fake costumes and toy guns).
    Every special forces geek know Spetznas aren't the most elite group in Russia. The elite group is so top secret, the members don't even know what it's called. To be even considered, you have to capture a live Siberian tiger female, after threatening her cubs, with your bare hands. The tiger must be unharmed, otherwise Putin comes personally and kills you with martial arts.

    After that, you have to capture and domesticate a wild bear, and later you go to battle riding on it.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bear-cavalry.jpg 
Views:	91 
Size:	279.4 KB 
ID:	12353

    Members thankful for this post (5):



  18. #48
    Senior Member Senior Member Fisherking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East of Augusta Vindelicorum
    Posts
    5,575

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Most countries have too many of these people and depleat their conventional forces. The US may be the worst for this.

    They use special ops for jobs that should be using cavalry scouts or a tank-infantry team.

    Tell me why the navy needs 2,000 seals when they have marine divisions. Special Ops are support troops not the battle fighters.

    The army cuts whole divisions and expands rangers and special forces

    Even the Air Force has thousands of them. For what?

    They train their infantry to act like special ops when they should be learning basic tactics. Everybody wants to be a ranger.

    They blow more money on a ranger company than an armored brigade. I won’t even go to what they do with the more classified organizations.

    Elite formations don’t equate to a strong war winning military. The mind set has pretty much been losing the war on terror or any other operations they have tried.

    They interest Hollywood and the public and glorify war.

    Surgical strikes don’t win guerrilla wars. Denying the fighters a hiding place does. Occupy and pacify. They don’t commit the troops to occupy and they had rectal-cranial-insertion when it came to hearts and minds.

    They need to get rid of about 90% of these forces and get back to occupying ground and denying the enemy a place and opportunity to operate.

    They fight short sharp actions against poorly defended objectives. If it is heavily defended they get help, except they are getting rid of the help to by more gadgets that still won’t get the job done.

    They use police SWAT tactics where one grenade or an RPG would take out the whole damned unit.

    The people behind this need theirs heads examined, preferably in a jar.
    Last edited by Fisherking; 02-28-2014 at 15:45.


    Education: that which reveals to the wise,
    and conceals from the stupid,
    the vast limits of their knowledge.
    Mark Twain

    Members thankful for this post (4):



  19. #49
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian View Post
    Every special forces geek know Spetznas aren't the most elite group in Russia. The elite group is so top secret, the members don't even know what it's called. To be even considered, you have to capture a live Siberian tiger female, after threatening her cubs, with your bare hands. The tiger must be unharmed, otherwise Putin comes personally and kills you with martial arts.

    After that, you have to capture and domesticate a wild bear, and later you go to battle riding on it.
    Bah... Siberian tiger...
    Candidates for the MJK needs to swim to Svalbard naked from Bergen, club some baby seals with their private parts and dress in their skin, before hunting down a hungry 2000 lb Polar bear, spit on its snout and skin it with their teeth. Only those able to swim back and deliver the polar bear pelt on the docks of the Naval Base in Bergen is considered "material" for the MJK
    Status Emeritus

    Members thankful for this post (2):



  20. #50
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Members thankful for this post (4):



  21. #51
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Bah... Siberian tiger...
    Candidates for the MJK needs to swim to Svalbard naked from Bergen, club some baby seals with their private parts and dress in their skin, before hunting down a hungry 2000 lb Polar bear, spit on its snout and skin it with their teeth. Only those able to swim back and deliver the polar bear pelt on the docks of the Naval Base in Bergen is considered "material" for the MJK
    That's just barbaric, the poor baby seals.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  22. #52
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Bah... Siberian tiger...
    Candidates for the MJK needs to swim to Svalbard naked from Bergen, club some Navy SEALs with their private parts and dress in their skin, before hunting down a hungry 200 lb Russian bear, spit on its snout and skin it with their teeth. Only those able to swim back and deliver the Russian bear pelt on the docks of the Naval Base in Bergen is considered "material" for the MJK
    Corrected.

    Members thankful for this post (3):



  23. #53
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Bah... Siberian tiger...
    Candidates for the MJK needs to swim to Svalbard naked from Bergen, club some baby seals with their private parts and dress in their skin, before hunting down a hungry 2000 lb Polar bear, spit on its snout and skin it with their teeth. Only those able to swim back and deliver the polar bear pelt on the docks of the Naval Base in Bergen is considered "material" for the MJK
    Pictures or it didn't happen.

  24. #54
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    I know personal thoughts have little to do with this debate, but there was this one happening in my life that I thought would be worth to share here.

    There was this situation in a bar where I was working, where 7 (wannabe gangsta) Turks were hassling a woman. This, big, Russian guy steps over to have a talk with them.

    These 7 turks were HUGE, and very obviously criminal and trained street thugs. Anyway, situation escalated and this Russian took them all down, hard.

    Now, I tell this because it WASN'T like in the movies, with a special ops guy manhandling a criminal gang. When it was all over, he had been stabbed a few times and was completely beaten up. From what I had seen, it had more to do with him being able to TAKE, rather than give.

    Afterwards I asked why he had done it, and he just rolled up his sleeve and shoved the tatoo. "Spetznaz" he said.

    He wasn't proud of it. He didn't say it to brag.

    He said it to explain why he had gone through what most people don't.

    I think each and every Delta Force, SAS or Kampfschwimmer would have the same ethos and same ability to GIVE hell. But what I saw in this Russians eyes gave me whole other perceptions of what it means to sustain hell, and let it mold and shape you.

    He saw it as his job to do, that had to go through. No more, no less.

    I have met Special Forces operatives from around the world, and they are all elite. Heroes even.

    This Russian was just a farmer who joined and made a hard life in the Army. I would however choose him to cover my back any day of the week.

    Members thankful for this post (2):

    HusarMyth 


  25. #55

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    It's pretty obvious that both regular and special forces participate. Each is suited to tasks of a different nature. Get over your anti-SF rageboner.
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  26. #56
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Guys, guys, guys. I know how to settle this debate. Let me just show you how elite American operators train, and you'll realize all your other special forces with fancy sounding foreign names that just mean the same thing can't measure up.

    But be warned - this is some intense training and you may not be able to handle it;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lARY...ature=youtu.be

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  27. #57
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelatinous Cube View Post
    SF do not win hearts and minds. The average troops who patrol the streets, talk to local leaders, and deal with the backlash from violent and often unexplained SF raids are the ones who do that.

    There's so much wrong in this thread I don't even know where to start. I was gonna stay out of it, but Husar's posts alone are enough to warrant this.
    What? Everything I say is perfectly 100% validated truth.

    You also completely misunderstood the whole thing about winning hearts and minds and who does that and where and when.
    The special forces you deal or dealt with the are the killer commando gung-ho types who pale in comparison to Spetsnaz.
    The special forces who are supposed to win hearts and minds, they are different, they were different and they are either not deployed in Afghanistan at all or they are working with locals in US-friendly villages somewhere far away from where you were stationed.

    It's also perfectly possible that the bloodthirsty US policies and the end of the cold war in combination with the terrorist scaretactics lead to a change in weight. In the sense that the killer commando special forces were increased in number while the number of winning hearts and minds operators was toned down. This would then obviously be a failure of US military strategy in Afghanistan and here we all thought that one was perfect...

    That said I also never called it winning hearts and minds and found that to be a bit wrong as these operators were usually sent to people who weren't all that fond of the enemy in the first place. It's not my fault that American governments in the past years have completely failed to utilize special forces the way they were originally intended to be used and gotten themselves into conflicts they cannot win using their favourite bloodthirsty retaliation rhetoric. That book I have is from 2000, so it was written before 9/11 started the whole terror craze and the downwards spiral in US military tactics and strategies.

    The focus on this topic also completely fails to recognize the actual point of my posts, which was that Spetsnaz are superior to all other special forces.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
    Guys, guys, guys. I know how to settle this debate. Let me just show you how elite American operators train, and you'll realize all your other special forces with fancy sounding foreign names that just mean the same thing can't measure up.

    But be warned - this is some intense training and you may not be able to handle it;
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lARY...ature=youtu.be

    CR
    Ugh, so they learn how to hit a target at <3m distance, the RPO Shmel has a range of 600m, the Spetsnaz will turn them into Kentucky fried chicks no matter how fast they can draw their peashooters.
    Last edited by Husar; 03-01-2014 at 03:14.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  28. #58

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Ugh, so they learn how to hit a target at <3m distance, the RPO Shmel has a range of 600m, the Spetsnaz will turn them into Kentucky fried chicks no matter how fast they can draw their peashooters.
    Just like the Germans would have won the war if they'd gotten a chance to build their 100-ton tanks.
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  29. #59
    Old Town Road Senior Member Strike For The South's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Between Louis' sheets
    Posts
    10,369

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    I liked the part where the white guy beat up all the Turks
    There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford

    My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

    I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.

    Members thankful for this post (5):



  30. #60
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Special Forces - who is the best?

    Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
    Just like the Germans would have won the war if they'd gotten a chance to build their 100-ton tanks.
    How is that relevant? It's not even correct and bears no resemblance to what I said.

    Quote Originally Posted by Strike For The South View Post
    I liked the part where the white guy beat up all the Turks
    I liked it too and I have a friend who is a turkey.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

    Member thankful for this post:



Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO