responding to common objections to bible part 7

[Brenus]

“Finally you are trying to prove a positive, you cannot rule out the other explanations given, and cant defend why your is false. So your claim is imagination at best.” I understand now why you got everything wrong. You don’t understand what you read.

“[had you read either bible or account your refer to].” I gave you a link. You obviously didn’t read it.

“[ important in court]”; Not. What is important is facts. Motive is use only for sentencing. Yesterday, at the Crown Court, a rapist got 16 years of jail. Jury and Judge didn’t care why he raped his grand-daughter as it is irrelevant. What was relevant was what he did.

“But so know were actually suppose to believe that the jews copied from their enemies, traveled all the way down there” You really have not a clue of what and whom we speak about, do you? The Sumerian Civilisation was extinct and their towns erased from the ground (so the authors of the Book of Gilgamesh) before the Jewish Civilisation even appear on the surface of earth. Sumerians and Hebrews never fight each other’s. The Jews copied from a dead civilisation because the book was transmitted through time by others civilisations…

“[you have no evidence for]”! You really should learn to read, or at least to understand the meaning of what others write.

“your faulty logic you apply.” I don’t apply logic. Where did I apply logic? I refer to Archaeological Evidences, material evidences, object you can see in museums: I refer you to: Clay Tablets of the Book of Gilgamesh, earliest Hebrew clay tablet, papyrus.

“logical fallacy of reification” Before to offer a link, read it, understand what it says, then, perhaps, you will find out it is irrelevant. Your problem is you so much in denial that you try to put your kind of demonstration as universal (by the way, the examples given in you links are rubbish).

“Brenus, there are many accounts that are more similar to the flood and creation of bible from places such as north america [Indian legends]” There is a lot of legend about Heroes killing dragons, that doesn’t make dragons a reality. And no, all floods legends are not similar to the Book of Gilgamesh.

“[many of them” Which one? Because I went to search and no, no much similarities. (600 legends). The vast majority differs on almost every things. The only really close are..... The Bible and the Book of Gilgamesh... Which is normal as the Bible one is largely copied from the oldest book.

[Pannonian]

“But so know were actually suppose to believe that the jews copied from their enemies, traveled all the way down there” You really have not a clue of what and whom we speak about, do you? The Sumerian Civilisation was extinct and their town erase from the ground (so the authors of the Book of Gilgamesh) before the Jewish Civilisation even appear on the surface of earth. Sumerians and Hebrews never fight each other’s. The Jews copied from a dead civilisation because the book was transmitted through time by others civilisations…

Here's another fallacy for TR to digest: temporal fallacy. It goes hand in hand with cluelessness. Eg. The British Empire adopted many of the trappings of the Roman Empire after the British conquered their deadly enemies the Romans.

[Sigurd]

Here is a little gem: Abraham was Sumerian.

[Brenus]

"Here is a little gem: Abraham was Sumerian.". I like this one. I read it somewhere, and the author(s) even didn't even ask, if so, why the Bible and the Book of Gilgamesh defer in term of number of gods and names.
The problems for the Biblecists have they can't can't answer all questions in a co-ordinate manner. One answer they will give to one point will contradict the answer they give to another point.