Restless crowns: forging empires [Late era -Skip a few]

[Tonno]

EDIT: I think yuon's idea for a fine to those who break NAP is a good addition to the rules.

That's a straight up bad idea. It removes a lot from game play, and blah blah blah, since most don't boder to read.

@sonnet: All I read is "blah blah blah I'm not happy."

No rules were broken were they? Then what is there to complain about? Yuon did an awfully, lawfully turn move.

But if you want to change the rules, then do so, so punishment can be dealt.

EDIT: And this is coming from someone who is rooting for the Moors, to be sure. I want to see yuon punished, too, but the fact is he did nothing wrong but lie. Lying is not against the rules.

@Emproment
To make it clear, rules are not everything. You see there's an exploit I used once, twice a bit more times over that. When your faction is turned AI and then back to human, or something like that. You can win battles by just leaveing out of them. I won with 300 men a full stack that was defending a castle, with 1 man lost.
I didn't broke any rules there, I exploited the situation I was given. I didn't play fair (yes moral, that dirty word)

What sonnet showed, to everyone should look like a pure exploit of the moors situation, it's not fair for him to do that. + if I am not misstaken I didn't saw any arguments against that from Castile.
For me if admin decides to punish or remove Castile I will not oppose. (that is, if Castile breaks the NAP)
It is gray area, but still, it's just over the top.