Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
Is that a personal attack?
It's to say that the post makes perfect sense without context, but in the actual context, it doesn't make much sense.

I say we cannot create a perfect AI, then you say me saying it does not make it true, even though you've been saying the same thing just above.

How long do you think it would take to create a software that has no bugs?
That's almost certainly impossible, as I've already hinted to.

And why would removing only the "most probable causes" be enough?
Enough according to what? If you can remove the most probable causes, then the time that passes between rogue incidents should be long; possibly much longer than corresponding times for rogue humans (i.e. spree shooters etc.)

How much do you think it would cost and who would be willing to pay for that?
You might as well ask me to predict the future.

Wht if the unfinished, buggy AI already gets leaked and used by others?
Then we'd have to destroy or quarantine the robots that implement it.