To Hijab or not to Hijab

[Brenus]

"How exactly is it against the constitution and basic human rights? No common sense, just more hypocrisy." Quite easy. Constitution says all human beings are born and stay equal under the law. No discrimination will be done under race, sex and social origin. So, when a organisation, religious or not, is preaching female are not equal, they brake the law. When an organisation say to kill the gay, it is a call to murder, it is illegal, so it should be prosecuted. When a organisation is preaching that some human are superior to others, and the others should be either kill or enslave, this is against the Constitution and human rights.
Illegal organisation don't have right to recruit and to try to spread illegal behavior. Mafiosi can't advertise, can they?
So what is the hypocrisy? To pretend that to walk in a portable jail is a choice, or it is imposed by misogynistic culture? Or to pretend that they freely do the choice? Because funny enough, still waiting the massive exodus of the oppressed Muslim fleeing France after the law was adopted. And, France being the most Muslin populated country in Europe (in you don't include the entire Turkey within Europe), it looks like the Muslim quite appreciate to be protected against their extremists.
You can pretend they are dislike the law, the fact is they don't.

"Muslim women feminist movements" Contradiction in terms. The female voice in Al Quaida or talibans (or Sauddi Arabia, Qatar and others United Emirates) is nearly zero.
What is true in what you wrote is the movement of headscarf was against the tyrants supported by the foreign powers.
However, I wouldn't qualify the Shah of Iran as "liberal pan-Arab communists and westerners", for him not to be an Arab, nor a liberal or communist.