9/11

[a completely inoffensive name]

The lowest melting point of any steel is 1370° C. A high yield alloy would have a higher melting point. The fire was not hot enough nor was it long enough to generate a catastrophic failure like that seen that day.

As for peer reviewed papers you can always find people who will go along with most hypothesis. Like Clark said, for every expert there is an equal and opposite expert.

There are more than 2,000 engineers and architects who are members of Engineers & Architects for 911 Truth. Something that would spoil their careers. Before deciding what you believe it is best to examine both sides of the story with an open mind.

You have no idea what you are talking about. You do not need to melt steel in order to have 80,000 tons of pressure come crashing down. By heating high strength steel even to 800 degrees Celsius the strength of the steel is reduced by a factor of two or more. This is not a government conspiracy, it is basic materials science. Do you even know that when making steel, the iron undergoes several internal structural phase transformations which allows the carbon atoms to penetrate the iron lattice, at which point quenching returns the iron lattice back to a tighter lattice which traps the carbon in interstitial gaps? Why are you trying to argue that steel needs to be heated to 1300+ degrees before failure, as if steel is homogenous and stable all the way up until its melting point? Please stop.