To be fair, I am not aware that the town leadership was aware that khaan would be attacked last night.![]()
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
I don't trust anyone atm. I never claimed I did. Assumed from Monty's statement that he did and merely said I didn't.
Im not ATPG and I never implied or said anything like that. I don't particularly care about the gold or the networking aspects. I simply want to get rid of people who are detrimental to the pirates.
He called me out in the thread and either caused someone to attack me or put it together himself. Instead of Pming me and asking me what happened, he decided to put it all out there in the thread. I could have just put it all out in the thread, but I decided not to. You guys mutinied and got rid of the only person who would have been able to corroborate my story. I find his methods harmful overall and his post's lacking for someone who seemingly should have a large deal of information. Both you and Visor seem nonchalant and conceited for people who claim to be hunting the French, while all you've really done is vig people who you decide are suspicious as far as I can tell.
But please tell me more about how I don't give a![]()
Ordnung muss sein.![]()
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
What does that mean?
He called me out in the thread
and either caused someone to attack me or put it together himself.
Instead of Pming me and asking me what happened, he decided to put it all out there in the thread.
What exactly is wrong with that? What is suspicious about it? Can you give a reason other than oh my god visor sucks?
Because...?I could have just put it all out in the thread, but I decided not to.
You don't even have a story.You guys mutinied and got rid of the only person who would have been able to corroborate my story.
What is harmful about it?I find his methods harmful overall
All of his posts?and his post's lacking for someone who seemingly should have a large deal of information.
How is that the case and why would it even matter?Both you and Visor seem nonchalant and conceited for people who claim to be hunting the French
As opposed to protecting suspicious people? Is vigging suspicious people wrong?while all you've really done is vig people who you decide are suspicious as far as I can tell.
Apparently you were in two places at one time, and you couldn't even be bothered to give any explanation at all. Today you voted Visor and couldn't be bothered to even fabricate a reason. I don't see you saying anywhere you think he's French. Tell me more about you do care about the French, and not just getting rid of someone who suspects you.But please tell me more about how I don't give a![]()
They weren't even aware that I didn't submit orders, so the only reason any of you know about it is because I was forthcoming after the fact and told them what Kage didn't. It's funny really, considering I caused it. Why else would I have voted him? Yeah, because that's the smart play here. Vote the guy who called you out in the thread. You've got some strange opinions about what guilty people do.
Gaius, do you have anything to say about Csargo?
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Only that I trust him (marginally) more than others in this game. I have no firm evidence as to his alignment, but we pulled a protection job together Night 1 (no attack came). He then told me unprompted that he had been asked by Kagemusha to protect Andres with Ituralde, did not, but received a PM from the latter saying that the protection was successful (no attack).
Since he did not know how this was possible (the rules state that simply the target surviving is enough for payment), such a revelation suggests to me that he, at least, actually protected our target.
Nihil nobis metuendum est, praeter metum ipsum. - Caesar
We have not to fear anything, except fear itself.
Ibant obscuri sola sub nocte per umbram
perque domos Ditis vacuas et inania regna:
quale per incertam lunam sub luce maligna
est iter in silvis, ubi caelum condidit umbra
Iuppiter, et rebus nox abstulit atra colorem. - Vergil
Bookmarks