Commitment scares me. Also reading the thread and looking for a better lead. But good for a default.
I thought you were making a Good Feathers cartoon reference.
What?
Explanation:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
The ghost of pizza thinks I should vote Vote: El berato
Scarlett votes for Elly.
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
Unvote; Vote:El Brato
Scarlett unvotes, then votes for the same person.
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
I unvoted btw.
Scarlett thinks she's unvoted. But she hasn't, unless I'm wrong about how this works.
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
Vote: Al Sips
She votes for Al.
Originally Posted by Golden1Knight
Vote: Al Sipsclar
Golden makes a stealthy post everyone notices.
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
Unvote; Vote:Al Sips until I figure out why Golden voted for him. It kind of pinged to me his vote.
Scarlett gets suspicious about this, and invites for Al...but then revotes for him again. But it's pretty clearly meant to remove her vote from Al because she's suspicious of GoldKnight's post. Unless she's just rehammering the same vote again again. But that's weird.
Conclusion: Scarlett is slightly confused about how voting is marked in the thread. I tried explaining yesterday, so today I tried just showing what an invite looked like. Unless this is the same system she normally uses in mafia? Then. Um. Dunno. Weird mafia ploy?
Originally Posted by Cuthillius
Meh. She's normally a pretty solid reasonable town. Not particularly unusual in any way. Good player, though.
Kay. I'm gonna put her into solid town then for now.
• You will vote for players you want lynched during the day, using the format, Vote: Visorslash. Votes must be in bold to count. If you wish to unvote, simply: Unvote; Vote: ATPG. You don't need to do a semicolon, I just think it looks nice. The vote tag is not essential but please make it very clear who you are voting for, I would suggest only bolding names for votes, never for emphasis.
My vote remained on you because you still didn't vote. I believe it's extremely unhelpful to town to hold votes until the very end. I actually care less about what people say to explain their thought process, because this is the game of deception and backstabbing. Their actions (votes and night actions) are more important to me.
I don't believe this at all. You've jumped pretty quick with people's reasoning as the basis for your votes besides Cas.
Vote: Al
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
You should see the way Visor wrote the unvote in the rules Raith.
Commitment scares me. Also reading the thread and looking for a better lead. But good for a default.
You can always unvote.
Originally Posted by Raith Kemmler
I thought you were making a Good Feathers cartoon reference.
Maybe I was…
Originally Posted by Raith Kemmler
Explanation:
(…)
Kay. I'm gonna put her into solid town then for now.
No, wait, what?
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
I don't think anyone will find this persuasive but me. But here's my thought process:
If Scarlett was mistaken about how voting works, and I'm starting to think I was totally wrong, it'd be weird for her to make a gaffe that provoked confusion with players. That sounds like an individual thing, not a mafia thing. If I saw a teammate making the mistake, I'd correct it in the mafia thread lest it provoke more attention later.
But as I'm thinking I was wrong about the formatting, this may all be nonsense.
I don't think anyone will find this persuasive but me. But here's my thought process:
If Scarlett was mistaken about how voting works, and I'm starting to think I was totally wrong, it'd be weird for her to make a gaffe that provoked confusion with players. That sounds like an individual thing, not a mafia thing. If I saw a teammate making the mistake, I'd correct it in the mafia thread lest it provoke more attention later.
But as I'm thinking I was wrong about the formatting, this may all be nonsense.
I'm just making it easier for him. You don't have to put the vote part though.
But as I'm thinking I was wrong about the formatting, this may all be nonsense.
Quite possibly so.
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
The thing that makes me think he is scum is his under the radar type play D1. It has a different tone then the others. The Csargo kill could possibly be someone who thinks he has good reads on this roster? Not sure because this is my first game.
How am I under the radar? I feel like I have a transponder stuck on "scum". As Cuth says below, I'm a permanent lynchbait.
Originally Posted by Cuthillius
I always find Sips hard to read. He seems to be a favorite mislynch target, but I haven't played enough with him to be certain of my reads.
I think we played in 3 games together. I was town in all, and you were scum in 2 out of three. Because of that I'm actually have to fight the scum bias against you.
Here are Al's posts.
To me, it seems like he's moving his vote around a little too much compared to the number of posts he's making and what he's saying. First he makes a sort of jokey vote, than he OMGUS's, then votes Cass because she hasn't voted enough. I just don't really see much mental transition between these and it kinda feels like he doesn't care much if any of them die.
Vote:Al Sipsclar
This seems rather silly to me. For what purpose would a mafioso move their vote around so much on day 1 for? It's too scatterbrained to be anything scheming. You might be correct that he doesn't care too much if they die or not, but that doesn't necessarily translate to him being mafia.
Vote: Scarlett Aria
While I find the case made by Cuthilius flimsy, I don't necessarily fault him for that in the sense of being guilty. What I *do* find suspicious is others latching onto it without any explanation of why they might agree with it. My eye is on GoldenKnight too, but Scarlett's setting off my bells slightly harder.
Originally Posted by Scarlett Aria
The thing that makes me think he is scum is his under the radar type play D1. It has a different tone then the others. The Csargo kill could possibly be someone who thinks he has good reads on this roster? Not sure because this is my first game.
Mostly for this. I don't even agree that Al was "under the radar". Under the radar is what I did. If he's flopping around with his vote, he's almost exactly the opposite; it's noisy and draws attention to himself. That doesn't strike me as mafia behavior, and it raises a brow from me that you would hop onto a case with such odd... reasoning.
It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.
Town:
Winston Hughes - less sure today, hope to see more activity during the week
Raith Kemmler - good content
Scarlett Aria - seems clueless enough to be town
Slight town:
Cuthillius - attempts at scumhunting
El Barto - good level of activity
landlubber - I like his activity level D1, though the first vote on Beskar worries me
edse - the way he reacted yesterday gives me some hope
Neutral/Unknown:
Severing viper - duplicate posts. Understandable since he's new to the forum, though might also show nervousness.
GeneralHankerchief - why Beskar had to die for you to live?
Autolycus - filthy lurker
Johnhughthom - hides behind Winston
seireikhaan - hides behind GH
Zain - seems overexcited, but understandable after a long hiatus
Cass_ - actually upgraded from slight scum. I understand that maybe it's the personal style, but I believe delaying the vote is anti-town.
Slight scum:
Jarema
Golden1Knight
Nightbringer
- low activity, don't like the votes.
Vote: Nightbringer I can also support lynching Jarema or Golden1Knight.
I don't like who and how you voted, Jarema. I'd like you to post more. What do you think of the game so far? Who do you think is town?
Below is everything you posted in the game so far.
Originally Posted by Jarema
vote: Cuthillius.
Hi there
Originally Posted by Jarema
vote: Edse. Lets create some pressure here
Originally Posted by Jarema
I do not know what you do not like in my votes, Al
I don't like who and how you voted, Jarema. I'd like you to post more. What do you think of the game so far? Who do you think is town?
Below is everything you posted in the game so far.
I was planning on dealing with that this morning, yeah. :I
I think we played in 3 games together. I was town in all, and you were scum in 2 out of three. Because of that I'm actually have to fight the scum bias against you.
Lol you're right. You just get mislynched by other townies, not generally the scum team.
That's correct, I don't care much if any of them die. Why should I if I don't believe they are helping town? We are lynching someone here every day.
I like this, you can be town for now. Unvote
Originally Posted by Raith Kemmler
Self demonstration: removing my vote from Cuthalious
Unvote
Lol. First you OMGUS, but actually not, so you just sort of pointless vote me for tagging you in a post, and then you unvote with just as much reason. Fish of Suspicion.
Me too. I got confused by an unfamiliar voting system. Mea culpa.
Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar
How am I under the radar? I feel like I have a transponder stuck on "scum". As Cuth says below, I'm a permanent lynchbait.
I think we played in 3 games together. I was town in all, and you were scum in 2 out of three. Because of that I'm actually have to fight the scum bias against you.
I agree with this. I've been dealing with maybe some cultural clashing with Al and Cuthilious, but I wouldn't say Al was under the radar. He's been proc'ing people aggressively.
What's Cuthiliious posting look like then and now? Any differences?
Originally Posted by seireikhaan
This seems rather silly to me. For what purpose would a mafioso move their vote around so much on day 1 for? It's too scatterbrained to be anything scheming.
Maybe. Too whatever for the mafia isn't a premise I'd chase very far game to game.
Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar
Slight scum:
Jarema
Golden1Knight
Nightbringer
- low activity, don't like the votes.
Me neither. The law of averages says they're probably not all mafia, but they're the same player. Well Golden, must be hard to stealth in all that shiney armor, is playing a glaringly insubstantial echo chamber game. Jarema posts are minimal, and Nightbringer is Jarema's grumpier brother.
Lynching all of them in a row? Fool's errand. But with no content, ignoring them is kind of bad too. Any ideas?
Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar
I don't like who and how you voted, Jarema. I'd like you to post more. What do you think of the game so far? Who do you think is town?
I'm Raith Kemmler, and I support this message.
Last edited by Raith Kemmler; 12-13-2015 at 17:13.
Reason: Grammar stuff
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Originally Posted by TosaInu
At times I read back my own posts [...]. It's not always clear at first glance.
I don't like who and how you voted, Jarema. I'd like you to post more. What do you think of the game so far? Who do you think is town?
Below is everything you posted in the game so far.
You did not answer me. I know why you dont like my level of activity, but why you dont like whom I voted?
I'm not seeing scumminess in Jarema's behavior. It's been noted in the past that townie Jarema is noticeably less verbose than scum Jarema. He tends to involve himself more when he's non-town. I do think that pressuring the inactives is a good strategy at this stage in the game, though.
A lot of Al Sips's other potential scum pings are pretty null. GH and Khaan always play off of each other, as do Winston and JHT, and Autolycus is never all that active compared to most players.
That being said, vote:Nightbringer is the best choice that I see. There are many players we need to see more from, and he's one of the most flagrant and most unreadable lurkers.
It's been noted in the past that townie Jarema is noticeably less verbose than scum Jarema.
Which I really regret.
As a scum, I feel that I owe it to my emies to give them something to analize, for the sake of fairness of the game. And, as a townie, I dont feel such obligation. Sometimes, I try to make cases, but it is hard with no informations from without the thread
What an opportune moment to crawl out of the woodwork! vote:autolycus
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
Bookmarks