Defending Daimyo\'s

[DEB8]

Blast ! My last game was a MI one and I didn't build any Geisha's ( I deleted the rest of my saves ) ...
Ergo : I can't test this...

[Yesugey]

Blast ! My last game was a MI one and I didn't build any Geisha's ( I deleted the rest of my saves ) ...
Ergo : I can't test this...

You can pick Tokugawa 1580 Campaign, and can have a Geisha only by building buildings and ending turns.

[ReluctantSamurai]

Rather insulting that he won't take anyone's word for it Must be an engineer type...gotta have empirical proof through "testing"....


.....I'm joking, of course

[DEB8]

Rather insulting that he won't take anyone's word for it Must be an engineer type...gotta have empirical proof through "testing"....


.....I'm joking, of course

No-ones memory is perfect... ( )

What I always fail to understand is why "people" persist in quoting previous inconcise "answers", rather than directly answering the exact question put. A straight Yes / No or Tested / Untested would have been sufficient ( and easier /shorter ) here.

[ Just observations ]

[ReluctantSamurai]

What I always fail to understand is why "people" persist in quoting previous inconcise "answers", rather than directly answering the exact question put.

Because I never "tested" it in a traditional sense, which would have required coming at it from multiple clans (which would answer the question of whether a particular clan or all clans could do it), and I really couldn't see why anyone would want to kill off your Daimyo (or an heir) when you have a limited number of them

My experience was one time. I wasn't paying attention to my heirs 'coming of age' date, and ended up with an heir who was a Musket unit. Too late to change, and not knowing at the time that heirs were not limitless, I attempted to send a ninja to assassinate him. Can't do it......

[DEB8]

Your suggusted "traditional" test is truly a full test ; however, IMHO, that is "beyond" the ( basic ) test required here ( which you have already clearly done )...

As stated before ( and considering your last reply ), a "Yes" or "Tested" would have sufficed, and would have been accurate, concise and unambiguous.

[ReluctantSamurai]

a "Yes" or "Tested" would have sufficed, and would have been accurate, concise and unambiguous

A one-off example (which I never attempted again) is not a test, IMO, which is what you were asking for, ie 'Can I take it you have "tested" this'. So if you are now satisfied, then that's that

[DEB8]

You can pick Tokugawa 1580 Campaign, and can have a Geisha only by building buildings and ending turns.

True - but I'm not that bothered re testing it...