Results 1 to 30 of 849

Thread: Mafia v. Cult [Concluded]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Mafia v. Cult [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by atheotes View Post
    Raith, Csargo and Al sips have showed up but not yet voted. Why?
    I've voted, and you're missing my vote in your tally.

  2. #2
    Member Member atheotes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    metaphysical Utopia...
    Posts
    2,914

    Default Re: Mafia v. Cult [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar View Post
    I've voted, and you're missing my vote in your tally.
    Sorry about that.
    Tally so far:
    Cuth - 1 (Sooh)
    Raith - 1 (Al Sips)
    Choxorn - 1 (Pelican)
    Sooh - 1(Cuth)
    Pelican-2 (atheotes, Jarema)

    Al Sipsclar, Why do you not trust Raith's claim? he claimed quite sometime ago and you never thought it was scummy before now? Seems convenient.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Mafia v. Cult [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by atheotes View Post
    Al Sipsclar, Why do you not trust Raith's claim? he claimed quite sometime ago and you never thought it was scummy before now? Seems convenient.
    I did voice my opinion about Raith's claim before:

    Quote Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
    I don't get why he claims right now either way though. It certainly doesn't help us beat cult if it's true, since it reduces the risk of their wasting a conversion on Raith.
    Exactly. Why claim when you could attract a night visit from the cult.
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar View Post
    Pelican tripped on the same post I made, so I believe he's with Pizza. Raith's claim is easy to do for a scum and unverifiable. Cuth and Jarema might be Pizza distancing partners.

  4. #4
    Member Member atheotes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    metaphysical Utopia...
    Posts
    2,914

    Default Re: Mafia v. Cult [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by Al Sipsclar View Post
    I did voice my opinion about Raith's claim before:
    fair enough. I would have thought a vote against him immediately would have been a stronger way to indicate your suspicion. Perhaps not your choice.

    Don't you think a single vote one someone in such a crucial phase is a waste? Since your case is not being supported by anyone, dont you think it is necessary to find alternate cases/suspects?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO