
Originally Posted by
Husar
I did reply to his comment by saying it was a different time when this was decided and then I expanded a bit on why I (and possibly Fragony) think the guy is being an ass about it. How is that not related to Viking's attempt to blame the other side? I haven't seen anyone here explain how a sentence on a banknote is dangerous to someone's atheism or why an atheist would need to feel bad about carrying such a sentence in his pocket? I can see how you think it is needless but these people are suing on the basis that it is somehow harmful to them or some such nonsense.
Bookmarks