Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: Weighted democracy (cumulative voting)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #16
    Member Member Greyblades's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    8,408
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Weighted democracy (cumulative voting)

    This sounds like a heavily US/UK-centric analysis. In the Norwegian parliament, there are usually between 7-8 political parties represented, seven of them are pretty much regulars; even if some of them are close to the thresholds for representation.

    Neither of the two political parties I could consider splitting my vote between are likely to drop out of the next parliament (quite the opposite, in fact; one is part of the current government, one was part of the previous government), I just don't want to exclusively vote for either of the two.
    I admit it is a UK/US centric view, but my understanding is that cumulative voting is intended to break a two part system; if your nation's parties are fractured what's the point?
    But someone's motivation is irrelevant for the inferiority or superiority of voting systems, anyway. That's just a distraction.
    A distraction from a distraction, Disception!

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    ...Distraption! Distracption? Man the inception joke really doesnt work with the word distraction.
    Last edited by Greyblades; 03-14-2016 at 17:27.
    Being better than the worst does not inherently make you good. But being better than the rest lets you brag.


    Quote Originally Posted by Strike For The South View Post
    Don't be scared that you don't freak out. Be scared when you don't care about freaking out
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO