More name calling I see.

If it is unreasonable for you to verify your "facts" why are you telling others to verify them?
More importantly why are you getting so aggressive when they do verify your "facts" and so easily show them to be false?

Perhaps the problem lies in you swallowing "data" from a link based on your preconcieved views rather than the real information your link contains.
How on earth can you possibly claim that there is a "deluge of legitimate cases" in that link when you appear to not have the faintest idea what your link actually contains?
I reciprocate respect, guess how much respect I get from you.

On the subject of verification I have been burned enough times on this forum to not use sources without at least making sure it is at least helping my claim not hurting it; I looked through enough to know it wasnt complete bull spit. Having something resembling a life I didnt dedicate my next few months using google translate to check each and every one.

As for aggression, pot meet kettle and no they dont easily show them to be false, I used to have the rug pulled out from under me frequently years ago, but the good debators have slowly bled away from the site and I have gotten better at not making your level of newbie mistakes.

Mistake one: cherry picking; looking for the smallest error and presenting it as disproving the entire thesis.