French Revolution Mafia [Concluded]

[Renata]

He was in the lead, and I don't like the spamming of nonsense. Call it what you will, but I can analyze constructive discussions better when I'm not distracted by whatever it is that Manasi is doing.

Manasi is an easy target because you can pretend just like you're doing here that you're doing it for the good of the thread. And it's not. I like Manasi and I don't want her lynched for being "distracting" in her very first game on the site. That's garbage.

[Montmorency]

I don't think so, Monty. I was prepared to go full Thunderdome with you, you or me, and you didn't even vote me. You have something to protect, more than I do. You have someone to let down, more than I do.

Are you sure? You've gone to bat for DP and Manasi. You've cottoned onto Pizza and Zack (though this one's given).

There's always another phase.

Manasi is an easy target because you can pretend just like you're doing here that you're doing it for the good of the thread. And it's not. I like Manasi and I don't want her lynched for being "distracting" in her very first game on the site. That's garbage.

Do you have a proposition?

[GeneralHankerchief]

Tally as of Post 429

Manasi: 5 | NotACop (112), Arakhor (115), Jabbz (392), BSmith (416), Logic (419)
BSmith: 3 | Fenn (131), Al Sipsclar (136), autolycus (287)
Jabbz: 3 | Lewwyn (233), seireikhaan (289), Zack (393)
Csargo: 2 | Kagemusha (63), Choxorn (310)
Montmorency: 1 | Dp101 (272)
Dp101: 1 | Montmorency (248)
Renata: 1 | Manasi (78)
atheotes: 1 | El Barto (146)
Sooh: 1 | Monstrdude (151)
Askthepizzaguy: 1 | atheotes (216)
Arakhor: 1 | ATPG (292)
El Barto: 1 | Snerk (301)
Logic: 1 | Renata (422)

No Lynch: 1 | Csargo (388)
Not voting: 1 | Sooh

Round ends:

[Renata]

Are you sure? You've gone to bat for DP and Manasi. You've cottoned onto Pizza and Zack (though this one's given).

There's always another phase.



Do you have a proposition?

Vote Logic. I promised myself I wasn't doing work this game.

[Montmorency]

Vote Logic. I promised myself I wasn't doing work this game.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Edit validity confirmed.

[GeneralHankerchief]

437

Manasi: 5 | NotACop (112), Arakhor (115), Jabbz (392), BSmith (416), Logic (419)
BSmith: 4 | Fenn (131), Al Sipsclar (136), autolycus (287), Kagemusha (436)
Jabbz: 3 | Lewwyn (233), seireikhaan (289), Zack (393)
Csargo: 1 | Choxorn (310)
Montmorency: 1 | Dp101 (272)
Dp101: 1 | Montmorency (248)
Renata: 1 | Manasi (78)
atheotes: 1 | El Barto (146)
Sooh: 1 | Monstrdude (151)
Askthepizzaguy: 1 | atheotes (216)
Arakhor: 1 | ATPG (292)
El Barto: 1 | Snerk (301)
Logic: 1 | Renata (422)

No Lynch: 1 | Csargo (388)
Not voting: 1 | Sooh

Round ends:

[Logic]

SHe was in the lead, and I don't like the spamming of nonsense. Call it what you will, but I can analyze constructive discussions better when I'm not distracted by whatever it is that Manasi is doing.

Forgive me for misgendering.

Manasi is an easy target because you can pretend just like you're doing here that you're doing it for the good of the thread. And it's not. I like Manasi and I don't want her lynched for being "distracting" in her very first game on the site. That's garbage.

I don't know Manasi, so I can't say I like or dislike her. But for me, it comes down to style. I find there are plenty of other places that welcome that kind of post habits, and I prefer to not see them in a game such as this.

I voted for Manasi directly calling me out for not taking the time to read through what was posted, and then she proceeded to add a bunch of additional non-contributing posts, which would make my aforementioned task lengthier. That habit can hide wolfiness (scumminess, mafioso, etc) and in my experience, I find it does so more often than not.

[Renata]

Forgive me for misgendering.
I don't know Manasi, so I can't say I like or dislike her. But for me, it comes down to style. I find there are plenty of other places that welcome that kind of post habits, and I prefer to not see them in a game such as this.

I voted for Manasi directly calling me out for not taking the time to read through what was posted, and then she proceeded to add a bunch of additional non-contributing posts, which would make my aforementioned task lengthier. That habit can hide wolfiness (scumminess, mafioso, etc) and in my experience, I find it does so more often than not.

If you're town we're never going to see eye to eye. You're coming off as scum-schoolmarm here.

[Montmorency]

If you're town we're never going to see eye to eye. You're coming off as scum-schoolmarm here.

That's a pretty sweeping statement about Logic on the basis of that one post, which contains a sentiment that has been presented with many variations in games you played.

This doesn't sit right.

[Renata]

Monty, go find scum. I'm not the droid you're looking for.

[Fenn]

I ain't sitting on a joke vote.
Unvote; Vote: Jabbz
He reads all wrong.

Also really not liking Csargo's refusal to take a position on anything or anybody even though he is active but I gotta prioritize here.

[Snerk]

I'd lynch Manisi over BSmith.

unvote, vote: Manasi

[Logic]

If you're town we're never going to see eye to eye. You're coming off as scum-schoolmarm here.

Why would that be a cause for never seeing eye-to-eye? I also dislike taking out new-comers for seemingly no reason, but I dislike the seemingly spam postings as well, because it hides and distracts from comments of value. I want someone to say something more related to the game than images of contemporary art.

"Schoolmarm" feels like you are trying to insult me without actually doing so. Have I offended you so much?

[Renata]

Why would that be a cause for never seeing eye-to-eye? I also dislike taking out new-comers for seemingly no reason, but I dislike the seemingly spam postings as well, because it hides and distracts from comments of value. I want someone to say something more related to the game than images of contemporary art.

"Schoolmarm" feels like you are trying to insult me without actually doing so. Have I offended you so much?

It's the tone of your last sentence or so back there where you're saying so confidently that scum often hide behind lots and lots of posting, more than town does the same thing. In my experience that's just not true.