As it is often the story with tests and quizzes some initial premises are ill-worded and the values which are meant to represent opposite foci of an imagined scale include notions which can't be counterposed. And on the other hand some tenets grouped into one category may contradict each other:
Even distribution of values isn't opposite to rapid growth as well as progressive tax code doesn't exclude lowering taxes.
One may value sovereignty, but oppose aggressive foreign policy. Partriotism and nationalism have different axiological connotations.
Connected with the previous one: supporting sovereignty doesn't exclude supporting cooperation and integration at different levels.
As post 11\9 America showed, liberty can co-exist with governmnet surveillance.
Moral code and religiousness don't exclude rationality or technological research.
Generally, I feel like I'm offered a choice what I like more - tomatoes or driving a car.
Bookmarks