Well, sure. But even if I didn’t know, I’d rather have killed/lynched a townie than a neutral third party.
Originally Posted by Logic
But why?
At the very least, a townie shares your win condition. A neutral has his or her own win condition, and if the opportunity arises to for them to win by making you lose, they will take it.
Originally Posted by Montmorency
Townies have to lose, by definition. Survivors don't. Of course it's a risk, but as the most fundamental risk is to the Survivor, live-and-let-live is a valid mutual strategy to pursue.
BSmith meant that he’d rather have killed/lynched a townie than a neutral third party as scum.
The whole discussion can probably be put to rest, it seems like a pointless digression.
Bookmarks