Catching up on the stuff I missed from D3, here's a couple of quick hits:
---
My Jabbz case was one of him monitoring the thread (as evidenced by his thanking the one post by Zack I think?) but him not actually saying anything, meaning that he was fine coasting with a (what appeared at the time to be) lopsided lynch of a known townie (myself). His defense of having RL obligations that weekend doesn't really do much for me and it's a case of deflection since it doesn't address the core issue of there being evidence of him being present but not active.
---
The difference between my EOD behavior for D2 and D3 was that in D2, I had fully caught up to the thread with like 2 minutes ago and made a snap decision. In D3 I had only read about the most recent page and had missed quite a bit of time's worth of material, which is why I was more cautious with the vote.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
D4 business, my most pressing concerns:
It appears that Monty is still continually refusing to view anyone aside from Barto and myself through the "possible scum" lens. This is bad in and of itself, but I want something more concrete from you: You've been arguing with Zack fairly consistently ever since he entered the game but have not, from what I've read, actually given a concrete read on him. So: what is your read on Zack, and why is it what it is? Surely you've had enough interactions with him at this point to form an opinion on him.
Logic, some of your conclusions in 1113 are awkward. The Jabbz thing especially. Do you consider his defense of you to be townie or scummy? If it's neither, what's your actual read on him and why is it that way? Why has your opinion of me softened?
Bookmarks