XCOM Mafia [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

where do you get that impression

Here

It's garbage the day ends in 3 hours. this

I don't feel great about novice, manasi, Sooh, or Bsmith. Maybe in the night I'll be able to catch up. Of those options Bsmith is the least helpful, so I'm going to go with Cuth here.

Vote:BSmith

...but you were previously voting for sooh...

What changed your mind there?

Cuth.

I was wondering the same thing. Monty trying to shade me hard. Interesting.

You were wondering? But you answered that question just now, so what were you wondering about?

I was at work on my phone, I didn't see Fred's case. I don't even need to see it, because the sum total of BSmith's posts and vote D2 already make him look awful.

[Csargo]

Here











You were wondering? But you answered that question just now, so what were you wondering about?

Why you thought Cuth was convinced by Fred's case? He didn't even mention it when he voted.

vote: bsmith

i feel like manasi/sooh could have one and novice could be one

but at the same time

i think smith's vote and subsequent explanation look worse

i

i really dunno right now

I thought that's what Cuth was talking about, and it's what I'm talking about. The only reason to assume that is because it came after Fred's post. Unless I'm missing something here.

[Montmorency]

Why you thought Cuth was convinced by Fred's case? He didn't even mention it when he voted.



I thought that's what Cuth was talking about, and it's what I'm talking about. The only reason to assume that is because it came after Fred's post. Unless I'm missing something here.

That is what I assumed, but OK. I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption though, more reasonable than scum clandestine coordination, which is itself more reasonable than outright crossposting IMO.

But you can never lose sight of Coincidence, I guess.

[Csargo]

That is what I assumed, but OK. I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption though, more reasonable than scum clandestine coordination, which is itself more reasonable than outright crossposting IMO.

But you can never lose sight of Coincidence, I guess.

I'm just not entirely sure what you're trying to argue tbh. Seems convoluted, and isn't very clear. Fredwood made a case that Cuth sheeped then I sheeped Cuth, but I should have sheeped Fredwood because he was the original, ergo I look bad because I sheeped Cuth. When the correct person I should have sheeped was Fredwood, but there's no evidence in the thread that Cuth sheeped Fredwood. Feels like you're just trying to build a narrative that makes me look bad for inane reasons.