Chess - Game Thread [Concluded]

[Dp101]

not a wolf

or town?

I don't care for the push on him either, but that's a S P I C Y leap.

Well, a S P I C Y read was requested. I personally think that being worn out is a pretty likely reason for his volume and play thus far. I never really buy the "town got all the best players I guess we've lost" explanation for lost WIM, and personally, find lack of WIM to be pretty NAI overall. If the main thing against him is lack of content, then I think the case is bad, and other than lacking in quantity, his posts have been tonally sound, so, town.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Okay so I got distracted doing other stuff and was only able to get to Fred and Barto.

Barto I still have no idea on, and probably won't until we get a flip. Wouldn't say no to lynching him but at the same time I fully recognize this is a lazy read. Don't care though.

Fred I feel somewhat better about, I think it was dp(?) who said that while he was around he made some pretty good points, and here I agree pretty much. Seems natural and focused, not really forcing anything. Fred can be town today.

[Cuthillius]

Well, a S P I C Y read was requested. I personally think that being worn out is a pretty likely reason for his volume and play thus far. I never really buy the "town got all the best players I guess we've lost" explanation for lost WIM, and personally, find lack of WIM to be pretty NAI overall. If the main thing against him is lack of content, then I think the case is bad, and other than lacking in quantity, his posts have been tonally sound, so, town.

how so tonally sound

i agree that lack of wim is a bad reason and is generally, including in this case, nai

nevertheless

do you mean "didn't make any obvious wolfslips"

or does the fact that there's a bad case on him make you think he's more villagery

but fair enough i'm fine with this read and the way you phrased it

[Dp101]

how so tonally sound

i agree that lack of wim is a bad reason and is generally, including in this case, nai

nevertheless

do you mean "didn't make any obvious wolfslips"

or does the fact that there's a bad case on him make you think he's more villagery

but fair enough i'm fine with this read and the way you phrased it

No obvious wolfslips and the posting has been honest. I don't particularly care about the fact that other people are wrong on him because atm I'm not sure that scum would pick him as a counterwagon if in danger (assuming we are right on logic).