What's wrong with "Chimney Pete"?Meh, minority rule naturally in what used to be Amsterdam, no more black-pete because of a few SJW. You try explaining that black-pete is not a black slave and exists in different forms all over Europe to people of whom half of them don't even know who their father is. (or have a fatherrrrrr)
What if it's not so much the sexual preferences as the community of people and their maintenance of recognition?All of those are not traditional, including polygamy, polyandry, paedophilia, zoophilia and so on. But you are missing the point: I was arguing that whatever you do in bed is your own personal business (unless it hurts others). I don't see any reason to be proud of any of the sexual preferences and sport them for others to see.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Bookmarks