Results 1 to 30 of 152

Thread: Biblical Creation vs Evolution- the age of the Earth

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Gilrandir's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    4,010

    Default Re: Biblical Creation vs Evolution- the age of the Earth

    So, all this thread is meant to say that the universe is 7000 years old?
    Quote Originally Posted by Suraknar View Post
    The article exists for a reason yes, I did not write it...

  2. #2

    Default Re: Biblical Creation vs Evolution- the age of the Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilrandir View Post
    So, all this thread is meant to say that the universe is 7000 years old?
    I think it is more saying that uniformitarnism is a false assumption. Nothing could "prove" in the scientific sense the age of the earth if it is thousands or billions going into the observable past leaves the realm of repeatable science. Any attempt to do so takes the summations of uniformtarnism witch contradict themselves if it points to an old earth or young. So maybe it is that we cannot know the age of the earth by any modern in our time scientific methods.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  3. #3
    Headless Senior Member Pannonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,978

    Default Re: Biblical Creation vs Evolution- the age of the Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    I think it is more saying that uniformitarnism is a false assumption. Nothing could "prove" in the scientific sense the age of the earth if it is thousands or billions going into the observable past leaves the realm of repeatable science. Any attempt to do so takes the summations of uniformtarnism witch contradict themselves if it points to an old earth or young. So maybe it is that we cannot know the age of the earth by any modern in our time scientific methods.
    There's a hell of a lot more evidence for that model than that of the Young Earthers, whose evidence amounts to zero.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO