Results 1 to 30 of 1432

Thread: 04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: 04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by merl1n View Post
    can you elaborate on this? you picked 4 names out of the 7 talked about. do you think they're bad/wolves?
    Nah, I just put the names that he said contain a wolf in one spot.

    Mostly showing how attentive I can be, with insane reading comprehension skills.

  2. #2
    friendly wizard Member merl1n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    152

    Default Re: 04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Empoof View Post
    Nah, I just put the names that he said contain a wolf in one spot.

    Mostly showing how attentive I can be, with insane reading comprehension skills.
    oh, okay

    i was suspicious because you had the post about logic being good for bad reasons and then listed him in those names and i was like STOP RIGHT THERE CRIMINAL SCUM

    wdy think about the safe/not safe groupings and my thoughts on it?

  3. #3
    winston 4 champs Member Zack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    5,081

    Default Re: 04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

    ladd,

    what convinced you so much on barto?

  4. #4

    Default Re: 04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Zack Brannigan View Post
    ladd,

    what convinced you so much on barto?
    wpuldnt really say I am that convinced

    just think he was tge wolfiest early on

    I agree with your read there and his early phone post just looked like a read wolves know they are making on a villa (insaner) so hold themselves back and put it out there more as information than actually something they wanna push

  5. #5

    Default Re: 04/12 Generic Fantasy WW Game Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by merl1n View Post
    oh, okay

    i was suspicious because you had the post about logic being good for bad reasons and then listed him in those names and i was like STOP RIGHT THERE CRIMINAL SCUM

    wdy think about the safe/not safe groupings and my thoughts on it?
    At a baseline I agree with Zack that the thought to put people into safe/not safe groupings is probably villagery.

    I thought you responded rather inquisitively, and it's possible he made it up but I think he didn't. I can sorta see ways that make cuth put those people into each category. I'm just trying to not put too much stock into it as a whole and see how Cuth develops.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO