Casual december game

[Csargo]

Ampharos iso and related posts supplementing the read:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

NAI


NAI


Vote which is supported later.


NAI

NAI stuff


Addresses the general audience, which is a wolftell of mine, doesn't engage Logic directly, so this is wolfy passive aggression.

If this is a villager sussing someone, then there would be some engagement with the target to determine their alignment as opposed to already pushing a conclusion toward the other jurors.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I believe Ender is a wolf so far, and this is wolfy defense strategy.

Supplemental.



I think this is bad acting. I can't use this as persuasive, but the post doesnt read genuine at all, it has a wolfy tone.


Nonsensical and doesn't engage with someone that, purportedly, they are struggling to read, meaning me.

See next post:



Now I ask a solving question:





Amy does not engage or answer the question.

In summary, mostly wolftells, bad process or nonexistent process, not engaging with someone they're struggling to read, not interested in resolving that person's alignment, speaking to the general audience (the jury) and passive aggressively pushing a conclusion with regard to Logic as opposed to solving Logic in a genuine manner by engaging them.

Two disengagements, multiple bad acting wolfy tone fake posts, loads of passive aggression.

Nothing villagery at all in the iso, period.

I liked the Logic post, mostly cause I agree with it. And it doesn't really preclude Logic from engaging with it, but it is sort of passive in the way you described.

The post on you just seems wrong from my experience at least. The last line is bad in the post about you imo, the rest in fine^tm.

Overall, it's not great I'd agree.