@spmetla What do you think of this? The Russians have been relying on company-sized assault groups for a long time now, but this is the first in-depth breakdown I've seen of a variation. It seems Wagner really has inspired RuFOR to double down on the schosstruppen branch, as opposed to maneuver warfare doctrine. In American context, a detachment with up to 200 infantry, 13 AFV, and 6 tanks (not counting the two artillery batteries and other integrated arty) would be classified as a reinforced company, yes?

At any rate, this TOE places a very high emphasis on ranged suppression with close-quarters assault in close coordination.
I imagine it does work, it's quite a mix of combat power and capabilities, though the lack of engineer assets makes me wonder if they have special 'breach' configured forces too. Before there were stosstruppen though there was the Brusilov offensive in which the Russians did use infiltration and assault tactics to great effect.
I just wonder if the scale this is being implemented at is too small or not wide spread enough to have greater effect as it just seems of limited use so far, nothing that will allow a break through or even a local disruption of the defense. A platoon of tanks and a platoon of BMPs seems rather small to deal with a counter attack though with the superiority of equipment I imagine most local Ukrainian counter attacks are predominately infantry affairs.

For the terminology, we'd just call it a Task Force which is a catch all for Company and Battalion sized units with significant enablers or other maneuver elements attached in some manner.
Do also wonder about the training regime and rehearsals, a task organization change isn't alone, close coordination needs to be practiced to be fast and effective.