you misunderstand me
i was pointing out a fallacy in your offense
you cannot simultaneously argue that your reads get the people going while also operating in a world where you are being ignored by the player list
if your reads are zingers, nutella can't be town read for being the only person to engage with you
Perhaps a misunderstanding. I have found several people have engaged me much more than nutella has. It is not a matter of enagement, it is a matter that nutella was the only one bringing me up in a negative light and so I wondered if that was actually towntelling given the circumstances.
Although, explain your thought here more even though it isn't what I meant. What is your process to get to achro having zingers = nutella not having a tr
finally decided syn is town
it seems self-explanatory
you're upset that I think your reads hidden in prose walls are inoffensive and safe
you considered giving nutella a town read for being the only one to truly engage you
if you're considering that, it means you acknowledge that you're not affecting the game state with your content
and if you're acknowledging that, it means you cannot actually have a problem with me saying your reads are inoffensive and safe, because that's exactly what they are in that world
and voting me for not immediately saluting and giving an in-depth report on your vulgard read (as proof that your reads are actually quite provocative) is just noise
I am not upset, I am suspicious. I try not to get upset about mafia anymore, doesn't go well for me.
Something not currently being discussed doesn't equate it to to being inoffensive and safe. One is a statement about the content I provided, the other is about how everyone else took it. I asked about the Vulgard read in particular because I remember thinking that a few people early had town reads on Vul while I didn't. So you giving a blanket statement, and then refusing to explain yourself when questioned, only invites misunderstandings of intent if you are town and tries to handwave concern actively if you are scum.
Although judging from this post I am wondering if we are even talking about the same thing here, as we seem to be operating under two different definitions of what inoffensive and safe means.
I can be rather noisy tbh
Bookmarks