Results 1 to 30 of 48

Thread: Crisis in Canada

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Hosakawa Tito View Post
    Not being familiar with how Canadian politics works; I was under the impression that losing a confidence vote automatically triggers another election. This seems to put quite a lot of power in the Governor General's hands essentially making that person king-maker.
    Losing a confidence vote in the House generally forces the Governor General to call an election. If a no-confidence motion passes or if a supply bill proposed by the government is defeated, then the government must resign or petition the Governor General for an election. The Governor General can decline the Prime Minister if the PM asks for an election, such as in the King-Byng affair. Considering there was a Canadian federal election relatively recently, the Governor General will probably decline a request for an election by Mr. Harper, even though an election could potentially propel him to a majority in the House of Commons and therefore a stable government.

    On the other hand, I give the coalition eighteen months. Maybe thirty. An issue that many Canadians have with the coalition is that Canada will probably have not just one, but two unelected Prime Ministers in the same government, because Mr. Dion has already announced his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party, and his successor would be chosen in convention by the Liberals. His successor will probably be Bob Rae or Michael Ignatieff, though it is wise to remember that Mr. Dion was essentially a dark horse candidate when he won the leadership after he won Gerrard Kennedy's surprise backing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Meneldil View Post
    I don't see how such a coalition would be so crazy. All four parties involved basically have the same stance on almost all social and economical issues, bar a few exceptions (Quebec's independence being the main one).
    Canadians don't generally vote with the expectation of a coalition. Many anti-coalition advocates - and make no mistake, many of them voted Liberal or NDP in the last election - may not like the idea of two unelected Prime Ministers in a row, the idea of a coalition with the seperatist Bloc (a huge issue in English Canada, especially the West and Ontario), or the hypocrisy of Dion (who said he would never form a coalition with the NDP because of their "terrible economic policies," and is now forming a coalition with them because of the "difficult economic times...").

    This is essentially a power grab by the Liberals and Stephane Dion, and many don't like it, especially not at this time.

    He deserves it.
    Why? Because you are a leftist, or would you care to point out some actual policy?

  2. #2
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    Why? Because you are a leftist, or would you care to point out some actual policy?
    Actually there are many policy areas where he has been awful, but pointing them out is going to be futile because you won't listen to them anyway - you will merely agree with them...

    Yet here some of them are:
    • Rejected the idea of equal pay for equal work from the Pay Equity Taskforce.
    • Banning strikes from public unions until 2011 and cancelling collective agreements.
    • Selling $2 Billion in assets.
    • Cancelling public financing for votes (But retain the subsidy for political donations... which his party gets plenty of...)


    Further the idea that you do not have an elected Prime Minister is ridiculous - people vote for members of parliament from a party and then the party chooses who to elevate to Prime Minister. As such Canada has never had an elected Prime Minister. By definition there can't be.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  3. #3
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    Actually there are many policy areas where he has been awful, but pointing them out is going to be futile because you won't listen to them anyway - you will merely agree with them...
    In that case, there have been many policy areas where he is awful in your opinion...there are also many beneficial items of legislation that the Conservatives have put through. I also never said that I supported every single piece of legislation that Harper has put through or tried to put through, and I hope that most people disagree with at least one piece of legislation that even their favourite politician has tried to push through.

    Rejected the idea of equal pay for equal work from the Pay Equity Taskforce.
    Due to my understanding of Canadian law, a woman not receiving equal pay for equal work has the right to lodge an equality case under the Canadian constitution.

    Banning strikes from public unions until 2011 and cancelling collective agreements.
    Which the Tories didn't actually force through and instead decided not to put on the table, if you're talking about what I think you are...

    In addition, the strike ban was for civil servants.

    Selling $2 Billion in assets.
    You need to be more specific - this can be a positive thing.

    Cancelling public financing for votes (But retain the subsidy for political donations... which his party gets plenty of...)
    Whether that is a terrible idea or not is debateable. Remember, it was the Conservatives who put through legislation to prevent parties from getting corporate donations, union donations, and large donations from citizens.

    Further the idea that you do not have an elected Prime Minister is ridiculous - people vote for members of parliament from a party and then the party chooses who to elevate to Prime Minister. As such Canada has never had an elected Prime Minister. By definition there can't be.
    Sure - the Prime Ministerial candidate is chosen before the election. Believe it or not, some people didn't vote for the Liberals because of who their candidate was.
    Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 12-08-2008 at 05:31.

  4. #4
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    [*]Cancelling public financing for votes (But retain the subsidy for political donations... which his party gets plenty of...)[/LIST]
    This is bright idea was never even drafted into a bill. It was however the last straw for the other three parties. It was what drove them into forming a coalition.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  5. #5
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by lars573 View Post
    This is bright idea was never even drafted into a bill. It was however the last straw for the other three parties. It was what drove them into forming a coalition.
    It was an excuse to form a coalition - according to various sources they had been planning it for a while. Public funding was first implemented by the Chretien government for the exact purpose of helping them gain funds. There are good arguments for cancelling the funding, regardless of why Harper wanted to do it.
    Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 12-04-2008 at 22:28.

  6. #6
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    It was an excuse to form a coalition - according to various sources they had been planning it for a while. Public funding was first implemented by the Chretien government for the exact purpose of helping them gain funds. There are good arguments for cancelling the funding, regardless of why Harper wanted to do it.
    Public Funding for campaigns is what ensures that those who vote for a third party can have their voice heard - without this public financing there would be no way for these minor parties to get their message out.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  7. #7
    Old Town Road Senior Member Strike For The South's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Between Louis' sheets
    Posts
    10,369

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    Public Funding for campaigns is what ensures that those who vote for a third party can have their voice heard - without this public financing there would be no way for these minor parties to get their message out.
    I plan to marry rich
    There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford

    My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

    I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.

  8. #8
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    Public Funding for campaigns is what ensures that those who vote for a third party can have their voice heard - without this public financing there would be no way for these minor parties to get their message out.
    With per vote funding they get, by definition, a lot less money than the larger parties, making it easier for large parties to get their message out and overwhelm the little ones. Public funding heavily favours the party in power, and has since Chretien implemented it. But per vote funding is an ideologically debateable idea, and cancelling can be a good idea or a bad idea, depending on which side you choose to view.

    By the way, the Conservatives would also lose the most per vote money through this proposal.
    Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 12-05-2008 at 00:00.

  9. #9
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    With per vote funding they get, by definition, a lot less money than the larger parties, making it easier for large parties to get their message out and overwhelm the little ones. Public funding heavily favours the party in power, and has since Chretien implemented it. But per vote funding is an ideologically debateable idea, and cancelling can be a good idea or a bad idea, depending on which side you choose to view.

    By the way, the Conservatives would also lose the most per vote money through this proposal.
    If it is anything like the system we have down here (Which it is by the sounds of it) then the left-wing minor parties, which have no major source of fund raising (Except Unions which are usually attached to one of the larger parties), are reliant entirely upon public funds.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  10. #10
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    Public Funding for campaigns is what ensures that those who vote for a third party can have their voice heard - without this public financing there would be no way for these minor parties to get their message out.
    There's plenty of ways for groups to get their message out - the taxpayers shouldn't have to finance the aspirations of politicians. It is only a way for parties that can't find support among people to get money.

    And this whole thing is just a power grab - the coalition groups' excuse that they think the budget doesn't deal with the economic situation enough is a load of lies. They saw an opportunity and filled the air with hysterics about the budget.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  11. #11
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
    There's plenty of ways for groups to get their message out - the taxpayers shouldn't have to finance the aspirations of politicians. It is only a way for parties that can't find support among people to get money.
    That's why they require 3% of the vote.

    Elections are in the public interest, so people should pay for them. If you combine it with bans on various political donations you also curb the influence of business, unions and other special interest groups.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  12. #12
    Dyslexic agnostic insomniac Senior Member Goofball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Victoria, British Columbia
    Posts
    4,211

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit View Post
    There's plenty of ways for groups to get their message out - the taxpayers shouldn't have to finance the aspirations of politicians. It is only a way for parties that can't find support among people to get money.

    And this whole thing is just a power grab - the coalition groups' excuse that they think the budget doesn't deal with the economic situation enough is a load of lies. They saw an opportunity and filled the air with hysterics about the budget.

    CR
    CR, sometimes you're my favorite guy in the org. Very well said...
    "What, have Canadians run out of guns to steal from other Canadians and now need to piss all over our glee?"

    - TSM

  13. #13
    lurker Member JR-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    Public Funding for campaigns is what ensures that those who vote for a third party can have their voice heard - without this public financing there would be no way for these minor parties to get their message out.
    i personally believe that public funding of parties breeds an unconscious contempt for the will of the electorate, and would much rather see politicians actually fight for my money on the basis of their ideas and attitude.

  14. #14
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Our public funding scheme isn't as bad as it's been made out to be. Your party gets a few dollars for every vote you get. And there is a minimum % thresshold of the popular vote you to get too to qualify. 2% or 3% I think. While it does benefit the large parties more than the smaller ones, obviously. Since it's been implemented the NDP and Greens have been able to get their message out better and have done pregressively better in elections. I think it's a good system.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  15. #15
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Crisis in Canada

    Quote Originally Posted by Furunculu5 View Post
    i personally believe that public funding of parties breeds an unconscious contempt for the will of the electorate, and would much rather see politicians actually fight for my money on the basis of their ideas and attitude.
    I would rather my governments were not slaves to big business.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO