I'm really not sure what you are trying to say.
I'm not really trying to say anything. It's been a while since I participated in piracy discussions, so my research is a bit dated. Then comes along this article, which appeared quite reasonable and level-headed to me, so I thought "what the heck, I'll read it to get up to speed." Now, people are claiming that it's mostly BS and I'm wondering if I'd wasted my time. Naturally, I'd like to know, specifically, which parts are BS and which sources are unreliable (and what source data is inaccurate.)

I do understand if people can't be bothered, though.