A Modern Total War? (Discussion, Oppinions)

[DisruptorX]

Falklands War: Total War

[IsItStillThere]

Falklands War: Total War

LOL

Give Maggie Thatcher an AK47 and let her win it by herself.

[Sir Beane]

It seems this topic is more devicive than I first thought when I posted the poll .

It's great to see the arguments and counter arguments going on. Let's all try to keep the discussion based around points and facts rather than attacking other people and their oppinions directly. I'm not accusing anyone, but I can see the discussion heading that way if we aren't careful.

hellenes I think the point us 'narrow-minded' fans are trying to make is that a modern Total War game would be so different to previous titles it wouldn't really be Total War. I'm not saying a game like that couldn't be made, but if it was then it would be Total War in name only. Everything else I love about the series would have gone.

For me Total War is a godsend because I love the history of warfare and I have a great interest in many of the periods the series has covered. The thing is, Total War is the only game series to cover this period in the right amount of detail.

Age of Empires and Civilization try, but ultimately their gameplay just doesn't interest me in the same way. Total War has a unique blend of grand strategy and battle tactics. I would hate to see them do a Modern Total War because there are so many other companies doing the same time period.

If CA doesn't make games set in the Era of sword warfare, then who will?