The Golden Rule [Concluded]

[shlin28]

That's because Quintus never made an actual vote last round. Unless I've overlooked something 5 times.

Exactly, Quintus kept his vote till the last minute, and even then his vote is terribly wrong. (It wasn't bolded and its in brackets...) Methinks this is very very fishy.

Keep pressure on Quintus people! (In my case the barrel of my gun )

To Chaotix: I am not careless, I was being stupid in the earlier phases because there was nothing to act on... But now, there is something suspicious about Quintus, and I am ready to hound him like a vigilante hounds a criminal.

[Quintus.JC]

Exactly, Quintus kept his vote till the last minute, and even then his vote is terribly wrong. (It wasn't bolded and its in brackets...) Methinks this is very very fishy.

Keep pressure on Quintus people! (In my case the barrel of my gun )

To Chaotix: I am not careless, I was being stupid in the earlier phases because there was nothing to act on... But now, there is something suspicious about Quintus, and I am ready to hound him like a vigilante hounds a criminal.

Very fishy? the unbolded vote was a clear mistake, I knew that but couldn't edit my post containning the vote, so I simply posted a new one. The bracket abstain was simply a reminder of what I had voted earlier.

You was being stupid becuase in the earlier phases there was nothing to act on, but now there something suspcious about me and you've come to your senses. Thats a strange explaination coming from you Shlin, plus you don't seems to be much in the discussion apart from voting for me and starting a bandwaggon.

Vote: Shlin

[shlin28]

Very fishy? the unbolded vote was a clear mistake, I knew that but couldn't edit my post containning the vote, so I simply posted a new one. The bracket abstain was simply a reminder of what I had voted earlier.

You was being stupid becuase in the earlier phases there was nothing to act on, but now there something suspcious about me and you've come to your senses. Thats a strange explaination coming from you Shlin, plus you don't seems to be much in the discussion apart from voting for me and starting a bandwaggon.

Vote: Shlin

...

You do realise that you made NO valid votes last round right? No bolded ones, nope, nada, just a wrong vote at the end of the phase... I looked through all your posts last round, there were no bolded writings to be seen.

In any case, how is starting a bandwagon wrong? Others have free will, its not like I have my gun barrel pointed at their necks. Surely they are the ones who are suspicious as they got on my bandwagon.

[Beefy187]

...

You do realise that you made NO valid votes last round right? No bolded ones, nope, nada, just a wrong vote at the end of the phase... I looked through all your posts last round, there were no bolded writings to be seen.

In any case, how is starting a bandwagon wrong? Others have free will, its not like I have my gun barrel pointed at their necks. Surely they are the ones who are suspicious as they got on my bandwagon.

When bandwagon occurs, that means there were enough evidence or scumminess that everyone just piles on one fellow. Which means if you get bandwagon, its your fault for being scummy. Like Shlin said, I dont see how starting a bandwagoning is a bad thing.

This round gave us 3 suspicious players.

I cant see how not bolding the vote makes Quintus suspicious. Perhaps a little over defensive but thats about it.

Secondly GH who was accused to be controlling the discussion which I fail to see what is wrong with it. At least his giving us discussion, even though that has possibility of misleading. As for him voting for White_eyes last round, considering iirc GH has never played with White_eyes before White_eyes does seem extremely scummy although that is his natural playing style.

YLC I saw contradiction in your post saying "town lost without discussion." Isn't that what exactly GH is doing right now? Promoting discussion?

I am more weary of Reenk. Please explain why you voted for Seireikhaan and how he is acting suspicious.

Vote: Reenk


Quintus 2: (w&f, shlin)
shlin 2: (Chaotix, Quintus)

Beefy 1: (Tevash)
GH 1: (YLC)
seireikhaan: 1 (Reenk)
Reenk 2: (White_eyes, Beefy)
YLC 1: (khaan)
Tevash 1: (GH)

[Thermal]

Took a while to read, firstly please tell me if you'd like me to get involved with discussion or shut up for once, because it seems the more i talk the more i'm criticized, everyone is active so it will be hard voting, seeing as no lynch is frowned upon

@Yoyoma
I do realize it looks scummy saying my role looked innocent, but me along with 9 others, there were only 4 that i thought looked a bit dodgy, regardless as GH pointed out that method of voting is quite flawed, more or less giving us a focus point for days ones normal random lynch, plus the fact we don't know if the FBI and traitor are the same person or not, if theres 2 i would have thought they'd of been a night kill by now though anyway if i knew the FBI were involved massively in fraud, then i'd be committing suicide by posting the role descriptions.

Some suspicions do seem to be took out of hand i.e: Quintus' unbolded vote, how on earth is that suspicious?

I have noticed Tevash is rather active, and his posts look big because he quotes alot, when really he doesn't explain much at all, furthermore he constantly keeps a tally, helpful no doubt but easily his motive to show he's being helpful, to conceal attention from himself

Mentioning such as

"Anyways, I will just vote:Beefy for the same reasons I stated about a page ago"

Ummmm, first of all i have 80 posts a page so that would just confuse me, you don't summarize what this reason is, and it just feels like your reason for voting is degraded, explain again, we shouldn't have to look back to an unspecified post, probably in the hope people will take your word for it rather than look themselves.

Having said this its still a weak plea and i don't believe your the traitor/FBI, just a few minor things i pointed out no matter how nonsensical it may sound

yeah and tell me if u want me too shut up or speak more, then i won't get sued for supposedly lurking/or/and/over-active posting

[ULC]

YLC I saw contradiction in your post saying "town lost without discussion." Isn't that what exactly GH is doing right now? Promoting discussion?

Yes, but to me it seemed as if GH was posting bare minimum unless directly questioned or confronted, which seemed a bit shady to me. Then his reason for voting White Eyes was rather lazy and nonsensical - he never bothered to check his resources when he accused White Eyes, and jumped on him when he began discussing it, making the sudden assumption White Eyes was said agent - and made me do a double take.

My vote stands for now.

[Beefy187]

Yes, but to me it seemed as if GH was posting bare minimum unless directly questioned or confronted, which seemed a bit shady to me. Then his reason for voting White Eyes was rather lazy and nonsensical - he never bothered to check his resources when he accused White Eyes, and jumpoed on him when he began discussing it, making the sudden assumption White Eyes was said agent - and made me do a double take.

My vote stands for now.

Fair enough. Makes sense to me

[Thermal]

when does day end? i need to know when i have to vote by

[TevashSzat]

I have noticed Tevash is rather active, and his posts look big because he quotes alot, when really he doesn't explain much at all, furthermore he constantly keeps a tally, helpful no doubt but easily his motive to show he's being helpful, to conceal attention from himself

Well, I'm active because I'm on Christmas break right now and don't have too much to do at home.

I don't explain much because I don't see anyone particularly scummy atm

I keep a tally because well, I often keep tallies in the mafia games I play

[GeneralHankerchief]

Yes, but to me it seemed as if GH was posting bare minimum unless directly questioned or confronted, which seemed a bit shady to me. Then his reason for voting White Eyes was rather lazy and nonsensical - he never bothered to check his resources when he accused White Eyes, and jumped on him when he began discussing it, making the sudden assumption White Eyes was said agent - and made me do a double take.

My vote stands for now.

That's not the reason why I voted for White Eyes. I voted for White Eyes because I thought he was continuing to push the whole "hey, let's lynch because this role sounds suspicious" line of discussion.

[ULC]

That's not the reason why I voted for White Eyes. I voted for White Eyes because I thought he was continuing to push the whole "hey, let's lynch because this role sounds suspicious" line of discussion.

Yet when I questioned you, you gave me the "FBI agent" line. And again, it wasn't White Eyes who pushed that, and I noticed when he brought it up, you switched your vote on the basis that 'TBH, I thought "FBI Agent" was one of ATPG's pre-assigned roles in the beginning, which is why I jumped on you. Sorry I didn't make the connection.'

Yet he was only discussing the motives of the agent - neither of your reasons for accusing him are valid. Either your being lazy, incompetent, and neither are you - I find you to be a much more meticulous player then this GH...