Holmes was a good tool for certain things, I didn't see all its examples of uses, but wasn't it that post per page and vote pattern tool?
The number of posts per page can be easily found in the gameroom, by clicking on the post count. Then you note how many posts, and how many pages. Voting patterns are easy enough to identify by reposting all the vote tallies in one spot and thinking about it.
I'm curious to see if the tool can be refined to ignore the false readings certain townies give off, and be sensitive enough to detect the subtle scumtells that the real mafia leave. I am starting to wonder if I should ignore results that say someone is 100% scummy, because they've been off the mark. But it's also interesting to note that 90% of the scums did appear on the scum-o-meter to some degree, but I made a judgment call and decided others were scummier.
I think I need to use the tool in a more limited form, and read the results as a helpful suggestion, and then draw my own conclusions.
The more games I play, the fewer remaining viable strategies the mafia can use. The more games I analyze, the more complete the database. You will have to pull off something brilliant to continue fooling it, methinks. I should remind you, the tool has been effective already in some instances, and resulted in won games.
But more importantly, townies need to agree that certain behaviors aren't a good idea. Self-voting, for one. (My bad) Excuses for not being here, for another. We don't need to know. An excuse could very well be a lie. (I'm guilty of this too) Not contributing or saying things like "boy, thats a lot of posts. I'll read it later. Good luck town" is basically an excuse not to help us out.
If townies behave themselves, then the subtle self-defense behaviors of the mafia should become clearer. However, since they are trying to fool the system, I'm keeping that in mind as well.
Yak yak yak. Shut up, pizzaguy. Right.![]()
Bookmarks