Ask a sensible question .answer the question.
Or could you really imagine the scenario where reaching agreement will by magic increase the numbers of radicals and their support base instead of reducing it ?
Ask a sensible question .answer the question.
Or could you really imagine the scenario where reaching agreement will by magic increase the numbers of radicals and their support base instead of reducing it ?
Last edited by Hooahguy; 02-03-2009 at 21:08.
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Actually he did answer it.
Tribesman asserted that the "strong" efforts made by the IDF in Gaza and Lebanon made no lasting impact on the terrorist organizations they were attempting to degrade, despite claims of success on a superficial level. He asserts that this shows inherent "weakness" in that Israel, while trying to demonstrate power and resolve, displayed an inability to critically damage their chosen targets.
By extension, he's suggesting that military force is doomed to failure in this context and that Israel needs to negotiate with Hamas, Hezbollah and the other groups, or more probably with the nation-states that underwrite them, and then stick to the deal as written even though some of the real fringers will kill Israelis regardless of any settlement agreement.
Mind you, it would have been kinder if he'd explained the comment rather than zinging in the tagline and moving on, but I suspect he enjoys leaving you confused and frustrated.
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
Seamus, i asked him what he would do, if negotiation nor military force worked, to reduce the radicals.
also, asking the israelis to not do anything while israelis are dying is absurd. the politicians who werent doing anything would be voted out really quickly, and replaced with those who would act.
Last edited by Hooahguy; 02-03-2009 at 23:02.
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Oh looky replaced with those who would act.
By that you mean those that would use military strikes instead of negotiating
Well done Hooah , you see that the use of violence against the population makes the population more radical and turn to the more extreme groups .
oh sorry , the problem is that you can see it but don't actually see it .
Hey from what has been written here I thought that was his natural stateI suspect he enjoys leaving you confused and frustrated.![]()
no, not that. you may not agree now, but if there were terrorist attacks in your area, you would demand your government to do something.
when i said replaced with those who would act i was referring to Seamus's post, on Israel sticking to the deal as written even though the radicals will kill Israelis regardless of any settlement agreement.
in this case, diplomacy hasnt worked. israelis are still dying (in this case) and that is not acceptable.
but you still haven't answered my question:
if diplomacy and military fails, what would you do?
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Bookmarks