The helmet isn't all that particularly great. That thing is either ceremonial, art, or for some sort of chariot bourne infantry.
The helmet isn't all that particularly great. That thing is either ceremonial, art, or for some sort of chariot bourne infantry.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
I was once alive, but then a girl came and took out my ticker.
my 4 year old modding project--nearing completion: http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=219506 (if you wanna help, join me).
tired of ridiculous trouble with walking animations? then you need my brand newmotion capture for the common man!
"We have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if we put the belonging to, in the I don't know what, all gas lines will explode" -alBernameg
Remember that when the helmet of bone is struck, it will shatter to pieces and break, rather than transfer the concussive force such as with solid metal helmets. The durability is shorter, but the energy from the blow will not have as powerful of an impact as would metal. Objects that shatter are good for dispersing energy. That is why some bullet-proof vests have a ceramic-base plate built in that breaks and shatters in the form of cracks, which allows the energy to disperse, rather than wear a completely solid and unbreaking plate that would transfer energy directly to the wearer, which causes more damage from the sheer force.
My Balloon!
-Strategos Alexandros- "What to do with the Epeirotes?"
Why did the Romans fall?
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
And people who are stupid enough to enable someone to hit their head more than twice, full bronze helmet or not, shouldn't be too long lived on the battlefield anyway.![]()
Last edited by Smeel; 02-04-2009 at 02:02.
I don't know whether the Dendra Suit was useful or not, but I mentioned it because the OP asked if the mis-named Lorica Segmentata was the only amour made of large pieces, which it isn't. I don't think that there's any kind of explicit developmental link between them.
οἵη περ φύλλων γενεὴ τοίη δὲ καὶ ἀνδρῶν.
Even as are the generations of leaves, such are the lives of men.
Glaucus, son of Hippolochus, Illiad, 6.146
It's not too different from the Coat of Plates - an experiment from 13th Century Northern Europe.
'you owe it to that famous chick general whose name starts with a B'
OILAM TREBOPALA INDI PORCOM LAEBO INDI INTAM PECINAM ELMETIACUI
Well, I always though lorica segmentata was the most refined and sophisticated mass-produced and relatively durable (yes, I know one of its major issues was coming apart) example of its kind. And that is not Roman fanboy-ism speaking in me. The Medieval armour Elmetiacos showed was attached to a base, and the Mycenaean charioteer armour was rather bulky and simplified.
Oh, and yes, those two are more like laminated armour, as oudysseos wisely noted.
Last edited by Aemilius Paulus; 02-05-2009 at 00:49.
I am pretty sure I read that it was unique and its function unclear, but I don't have the source with me. I'll get back to it in a couple of days. Mycenaean chariots are presumably no more wobbly than any solid-tire vehicle made for traversing unflattened ground. Still, keeping your balance on them would take some effort.
Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!
The suit is unique and surprisingly intact for being in the ground since before the Greek Dark age.
However, it seems to have been well known enough to allegedly have ideograms of it from two sites:
Knossos
Pylos
So it was known during the period it was supposedly used but no one has any ideas of what its exact purpose was. So its kinda a LS type situation where it existed and there are representations and permutations of it but its still kinda a unicorn.
http://www.salimbeti.com/micenei/armour1.htm
Last edited by antisocialmunky; 02-07-2009 at 19:39.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Yes, as shown in the Linear B ideograms, such heavy panoplies were not uncommon, it is just that, as one so often finds elsewhere with armour, very little has survived. We are incredibly lucky to have a complete example of such a panoply.
Sure, it would take some effort, just like fighting on horseback without stirrups and with only a basic saddle in a heavy panoply. That doesn't mean it wasn't done, or wasn't commonplace.
Any source stating that the nature or the purpose of this armour is unclear is not very informative. It's obvious from examining other parallels that such armour would be worn by a charioteer, who had the benefit of not having to run around on the battlefield; who would be rich enough to afford it; and who, not holding a shield, would need the benefit of a heavy panoply for maximum protection. Besides, I am curious to hear what these sources state could be other uses for such armour; heavy infantrymen? Or do they take the usual cop-out and declare it "ritual armour"?
I've always been partial to the built it->test it->refine technique->repeat method of testing. As much as people complain about lack of creativity there sure is a lot of it. Perhaps people need to be more creative in looking for their own uncreativity and mental hangups.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
"Chariots" by Arthur Cotterell states the following (chapter 4, pages 112-113):
There is no further discussion of the Dendra armour's use. I thought I also saw a mention of it in Hans van Wees' "Greek Warfare: Myths and Realities", but I cannot find it in the index, and the book does not deal with warfare from before Homer's time.Because the Dendra equipment is far too heavy and unwieldy for a foot soldier, some scholars believe its wearer would have stood in a chariot. But again the weight and cumbersomeness of the armour could not but have been a serious liability in a fast-moving chariot. Unlike the armoured medieval knight, the Dendra warrior was not seated on a high saddle with his legs gripping the sides of a horse, and his feet placed safely in stirrups: instead, if an archer never accompanied the charioteer, he was trying to maintain his balance while thrusting sideways with a two-handed spear.
The argument for the Dendra armour belonging to a chariot warrior is unconvincing. Apart from the weight problem, there are records of lighter corselets more suited to this purpose, similar to the protection Menelaus was lucky enough to be wearing at Troy. Most telling of all, however, is the narrative of the Iliad, for Pandarus [an Eastern bowman in Trojan service who became convinced of the uselessness of his bow, and joined Aeneas on his chariot] did not fight from Aeneas' chariot as a thrusting spearman. On the contrary, he threw a javelin at Diomedes, a weapon used in addition to the bow by the Egyptians in their chariots. Pandarus' sudden death after the failure of this throw may well have seemed just to Homes, since the javelin as well as the arrow harmed heroes at an unfair distance, especially when launched from a speeding chariot.
Last edited by Ludens; 02-10-2009 at 13:41.
Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!
Bookmarks