OOC Thread and Chatroom

**/Bean\** · 02-26-2009, 23:44

Actually, I do have to agree that these are some pretty good reforms if we want it to be more historical. I think this is good for the game (directed at Navarro)-maybe we should have an OOC vote on it, but it's your game, so your final decision, and I'll go along with either. But I think this will make our PBM more original and different, and you never know, it might just work better.

Another

for mini, I think. Wouldn't you agree?

**mini** · 02-26-2009, 23:50

hehe :D

Well i'll read the feedback tomorrow, due bedtime here :)

**/Bean\** · 02-26-2009, 23:59

Snap

**navarro951** · 02-27-2009, 00:06

Originally Posted by everyone

oh noes I have just came back from school and I found out that Cicero's new commander is navarro. I hope he doesn't get my avatar killed (again).

I've a question about Consular legions though, which consul owns them/it? I suppose currently only one consul has control of a consular legion because we've only one.

well at the moment we only have the money for 1. In time yes both Consuls will have one.

Originally Posted by _Bean_

Actually, I do have to agree that these are some pretty good reforms if we want it to be more historical. I think this is good for the game (directed at Navarro)-maybe we should have an OOC vote on it, but it's your game, so your final decision, and I'll go along with either. But I think this will make our PBM more original and different, and you never know, it might just work better.

Another

for mini, I think. Wouldn't you agree?

Its not that im not open for change in the rules, i am. And some of these ideas are great but you have to consider this is a game of incentives. Whether all of them are historically accurate is not always the point, I also want people to have an incentive to be higher or what have you. Like having multiple Tribune of Plebs seems a bit meh...so to speak. If there were a bunch where would be the fun in that, the ToPs is like THE tribune for his time at the position. Or Consuls HAVING to stay in Rome when some of them, like Caesar and Pompeii were, are military men as well as political machines. I also feel to, regarding legion set up, no one brings into count cost and complication. It is not always as easy to give EVERY legion certain troops as we are not yet the rich Rome to be seen in the future. I will review and consider alot of Mini's idea as I see alot of good work and effort in them. Lemme see what I can come up with...

**/Bean\** · 02-27-2009, 00:16

Oh I never expected new ideas to be implemented without editting and work around. I entirely see your point with the issues surrounding gameplay wise though. For all it's accuracy, we still need to have fun playing this game. With open debate and contribution from different people, I'm sure we can make a fine work around.

**navarro951** · 02-27-2009, 00:23

indeed, now if you will excuse me I must begin editing the library and history thread....(KILL ME NOW!)

**Potocello** · 02-27-2009, 03:35

Originally Posted by navarro951

indeed, now if you will excuse me I must begin editing the library and history thread....(KILL ME NOW!)

have fun!

**Tiberius Claudius Marcellus** · 02-27-2009, 06:14

Wow, pretty thorough as far as rough drafts go, Mini. I second Bean's idea of a balloon to you.

I think that a lot of these rules will absolutely be impossible unless we were to have roughly 20 players, or so - to implement all of the governing positions as well as keep Tribuni in the legions since most RL players won't like the idea of sitting around Roma waiting for anciliaries.

If and when we decide on any rule changes (I still advocate that they be brought about through Charter Ammendments in the Curia, rather than *poof* they magically appear) we can RP the "neccesity" to bring about the changes has arisen, just like the Script describes how the military reforms were brought about through experience / necessity.