Sasaki: 2 (boudica, taka)
taka: 2 (GeneralHanky, Sasaki)
So we are stuck? Although it is true that taka seems (almost stereotypically?) suspicious I still can't ignore my intuition. Sasaki makes very good points and I like his attempt at a 'trap' using editing again, which I DID notice and actually feel suspicious of: I've never played a small game before, but if I was King then I would try to play super-town as Sasaki kind of has and hope that people would squirm enough, when put under the spotlight to acidentally look incriminating enough to lynch.
It was Sasaki's post saying how he wasn't going to put much in to this game, after nothing much came of his plan that makes my vote stick on him. Entirely possible that I'm trying to read too much into it all of course :D GH, why taka and not Sasaki?
Bookmarks