Definitely disagree about excluding diplomacy. If the British or French had come in supporting the South, history could have been far different.
Definitely disagree about excluding diplomacy. If the British or French had come in supporting the South, history could have been far different.
An E:TW AAR on the American Revolution: The Long March of Liberty
CA could make an empire expansion similar to kingdoms, focusing on many different areas perhaps?
The Napoleonic era is one I'd like to see the most. The opportunity to take charge of one of the most brilliant general of all time is an offer that few could refuse, also the opposing alliance of British and Prussia also had its own share of talents, not minding some of the supreme generals the Russians were producing during that time, and that Austrian slimy Metternich... Yes, CA really can't turn down that offer.
The US Civil war has been talked about a lot as a possible expansion, the time era certainly would generates a lot of interestes from fans. For all its worth there would definitely be enough factions to make it a action-packed game, a worthy idea for the expansion indeed.
The other area that generates some interest could go round Asia, India is a possibility, a campaign circled around India would certainly remind me of the America: Campaign. With the British replacing the Spaniards and Mughals replacing the Aztecs. Other Europeans could drop in also, the idea seems ok, although the Americas expasion definitely wasn't my favourite of the kingdoms pack.
Mmm, Monitors...
I wouldn't mind a 17th century prequel. There's already some 17th century style units at the beginning of the campaigns. You may need to rebalance pike-musket-cavalry but it could be done with minimum changes under the bonnet.
Now back to RtI. I've got to capture Quebec.
ETW campaigns:![]()
![]()
I would be happy if the expansion didn't even have any new campaigns, but instead just some new map/trade theatres. If the gameplay was extended until say 1837, which was the beginning of the Victorian era, that way new land theatres could be added for Southern Africa and Eastern Asia, with perhaps a new trade theatre around the Red Sea.
Last edited by Rhyfelwyr; 03-05-2009 at 23:04.
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Sounds good, they could even go up to the end of the 19th century as there would no real revolutions in miltary tech until the great war... Just more powerful and efficient version of what they had (artillery, rifles and such). You could even open up Africa for colonization...
The US was busy moving west, and had the how civil war thing.... Europe was full of conflict...
I like...
(I also think the 17th century shot & pike idea was good too, but I think we will see that from modders)...
I have to vote for a Kingdoms-style expansion too.
Napoleonic Wars - Think Alexander: Conquer X in Y turns.
U.S. Civil War - I'm thinking very zoomed in on the eastern half of the modern U.S., but still quite large in terms of actual space to move on map, with lots of territories. This one would be very tactical and less strategic since most of the cities will be highly developed, and you wont be doing a whole lot of teching within such a short time period. The turns could be set to just around a month, that'd come out to almost 50 turns. It would be a fast and furious campaign with lots, and lots of action. Oh, and GATLING GUNS!
Mexican War of Independence - I'm not an expert on this but it seems like it'd be fun. Pretty long conflict, plenty of guerilla warfare AFAIK.
Meiji Restoration? - Could be very interesting, a campaign focused more on nation management than constant fighting. Would have to modernize while trying to contain disgruntled Samurai.
China? - What going on in China during the Empire period and beyond when it came to colonialism and warfare?
Oh, and one thing I'd love for them to include in the vanilla Grand Campaign, AFRICA! It's a huge black hole, Africa not being there in a game about colonialism. I can see why they didn't get around to it, the game took forever to make as it is, but an expansion would be a perfect opportunity to complete the picture.
So many more possibilities, it makes me excited just daydreaming.
The Sun King's Ambition! So many wars and so many enemies, from the end of the Thirty Years War to the end of The War of Spanish Succession, in fact a Thirty Years War would be a good expansion, interesting time in terms of politics, millitary advancement and may also add more justification to the Religious aspect of ETW.
Sig by Durango
-Oscar WildeNow that the House of Commons is trying to become useful, it does a great deal of harm.
I would love to play the American Civil War especially the naval battles. However I do think that the Naval AI would have to be improved as a lot of the battles were on rivers and enclosed waters and I could see formations of ships getting grounded. also there would be a lot of ramming done as many of the ships of this period were designed to either have a large rams or Spar torpedoes ( basically a large explosive charge on the end of a stick which was dropped under the water and detonated just before the boat was rammed)
It would be cool tho.
I'm from the UK and would love to play this time frame.![]()
May the Foss be with you....
Honestly, Civil War is pretty much unknown outside of the US. I'm not sure CA would release an civil war-only based expansion.
Furthermore, it would only allow 2 main factions, with possibly a few more (France, Britain, Mexico, though neither of them had a really big impact). If an expansion taking place in the Americas was to be released, it would have to not only focuse on the Civil-War, but also on the Republic of Texas, on Mexico, and on the independence of Southern American States (Bolivar is obviously an interesting character who deserves to appear).
On the other hand, the Napoleonic Wars offer an interesting setting, pretty much known by everyone. And though most of the fighting took place in Europe, the US fought in the 1812 war.
Moreover, a Napoleonic era would probably require a lot of cool new options, like setting your brother as monarch of another country, or offering 'national ideas' a la EUIII.
I could settle with any of these (though I'd prefer a Napoleonic era one, as a frenchman), but I'd rather not have a Kingdoms-like expansion. At the end of the day, most new campaigns were watered down, with only a few factions, and were far frow challenging.
Of course it would have been, but it wouldn't make for a very challenging game, would it?
The compelling thing about the civil war was the two sides, although they were very different, were so evenly matched at the start. In other words, the outcome could have gone either way. So the game is challenging regardless of the side you choose. Bring a foreign power in on one side or the other and the situation is completely unbalanced.
Bookmarks