Which is completely irrelevant.
It's also so full of machismo it's untrue.
"In 1995, more than 250 children ages 14 and under died in bicycle-related crashes.""Only 142 children under 15 years of age died in gun accidents" 142 too many, and his use of the word "only" I find insulting.
From WikiAnswers. It isn't as if more gun control would help these children. Regardless, even if it did help them, the Second Amendment needs to stay. Why? Here you go.
The Cato Institute is the source. They take the statistics and come to this conclusion. You can do it independently and come to the same result.He also gives no sources for his findings in the parts I read ( I must admit I couldn't bear to read too much of that garbage, sorry).
Bookmarks