It was a good thread while it lasted and should be archived for all to see.
And if you are going to start an AAR plz make sure that you actually HAVE the time to play it.
Seen way too many AAR quit out due to poor RL planning.
It was a good thread while it lasted and should be archived for all to see.
And if you are going to start an AAR plz make sure that you actually HAVE the time to play it.
Seen way too many AAR quit out due to poor RL planning.
My own personal SLAVE BAND (insert super evil laugh here)
My balloons:
My AAR The Story of Souls: A Sweboz AAR
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=109013
hey, how would these names be used?
I have a character, Diodotos Baktrios, and he is going to be known Sophos(the wise).
so would he be
Sophos Diodotos Baktrios
Diodotos Sophos Baktrios
Sophos Diodotos, or
Diodotos Sophos?
is this the same for all the titles in the thread?
would refering to them simply by title have been done?
and if he was king would he have been refered to as Sophos Basileus?
sorry for all the questions but I'm getting pretty keen on this aar and I'm discovering that the names aren't as simple as they seem at first.
- Four Horsemen of the Presence
Certainly, I'll be open to questions. I'm helping Centurio with his Anabaseis, I can help you anytime as well.
See the quoted part for all the literal translations. Don't they make the exact same meaning? It really doesn't matter how you use it. Now, a more frequent way of saying, would be: Diodotos Sophos or Diodotos Sophos Baktrios.
To further understand this concept, you must understand that epithets were used for Hellenistic rulers in order to define them from others, in the same way we officially call Alexander the Great Alexander III, because he was the 3rd Macedonian King with the name "Alexander". The Hellenes, not favouring numbers, used epithets. So if you were talking about "Megas Alexandros" back that time, everyone (literally in this case) would know who you were talking about.
Answering your other questions now, first of all it goes more or less the same for the rest of the titles. It depends really, so feel free to ask if not sure. As for the reference to them, they would probably be called by their titles, so if say (your) Diodotos is Basileus and defeated the Parthians, he would formally be addressed or referenced as: Basileus Diodotos Baktrios "Nikesas Parthon", "bla bla bla". The "bla bla bla" part is the part were all his given titles are referenced. The most important one, the "Basileus" part, goes first. So basically he wouldn't be referenced by his epithets, only titles. And "Sophos" is an epithet, not a title. The reason why their epithets weren't referenced, us because sometimes they were not exactly good for their prestige, like "Monophthalmos" (The One-Eyed), "Epimanes" (The Mad) etc. How would you feel as Basileus to be referenced by your defections?
Epithets, thus, were only used to distinguish rulers after their deaths, not during. Formally, at least. Everyday people could probably use their epithets as well, be that for praising him or making fun of him
Maion
~Maion
So these epithets are more informal, whereas the titles would be used in more formal situations like talking to other nations?
I remember in my last game one of my FM's got a trait called indophonos(not sure on the spelling) something to do with beating the Indians in battle, would this have been the kind of thing used as a title? If so I will rely on eb for my titles and just give them epithets, for something extra.
Cheers
- Four Horsemen of the Presence
Exactly, you got the point.
Indoktonos, or phonos, means "Killer", so it means "The Killer of Indians". And this could be used as a title. Not wise though, especially for the local population. Imagine yourself being ruled by Americans (not that we all aren't) and have a ruler appointed as your High Master or something, who also happens to be called "The Killer of Australians". Not exactly nice, right?
Maion
Last edited by Maion Maroneios; 04-07-2009 at 13:39.
~Maion
Bookmarks