Just what the hell is happening to my Babe Thread?

[Lemur]

Hi gang, here's an update on the Babe Thread:

I'm going to give it a week to cool down. Hosa and I are in agreement on that. When it re-opens, we're going to have some new rules. Nothing onerous or terrible, just stuff to help us manage it when idiots put inappropriate stuff up.

The main question now is whether the two patrons who were batting pedo-lite back and forth should receive a temporary or permanent ban.

If you have any questions, feel free to PM me or Hosa. Thanks.

[Ice]

Hi gang, here's an update on the Babe Thread:

I'm going to give it a week to cool down. Hosa and I are in agreement on that. When it re-opens, we're going to have some new rules. Nothing onerous or terrible, just stuff to help us manage it when idiots put inappropriate stuff up.

The main question now is whether the two patrons who were batting pedo-lite back and forth should receive a temporary or permanent ban.

If you have any questions, feel free to PM me or Hosa. Thanks.

If we are deciding this in a democratic manner, I'd say ban them permanently. Pedophilia does not deserve to be tolerated in the least bit.

Oh wait, the org isn't democratic?

[Strike For The South]

If we are deciding this in a democratic manner, I'd say ban them permanently. Pedophilia does not deserve to be tolerated in the least bit.

Oh wait, the org isn't democratic?

And we strike again. Bene

[KarlXII]

Full nudes of any kind deserve a perma-ban. Children in sexual positions/exposed deserve a perma-ban.

[Jolt]

Full nudes of any kind deserve a perma-ban.

*Ahem*. It depends on whether you see them in Real Life or here in the forum. :P Or on the person in the pic. :P Jokes, aside. Indeed, whoever posted the pedophilliac pictures should recieve the full force of the "BANZ!1 Stick".

[Lemur]

In fairness to the two patrons who triggered the lockdown, they posted a long series of erotic poses by women who looked and dressed young, but could easily have been of age. But that wasn't enough for them. They mixed in a couple of pictures of actual children in much less erotic poses.

Clearly they meant to imply pedophilia without actually committing it. I have zero patience for this sort of "let's see how close to the rules we can dance" behavior, and will have none of it. I suspect Hosa feels even more strongly.

Minimal accepted behavior is just that, it is the absolute bottom end of what we will tolerate. If someone thinks it's wicked cool to work that line and see how far they can push, well, this is what happens. In general Orgahs are a thoughtful, tasteful, good-spirited bunch, and that's a big part of why I've hung around for so many years. People who think it's clever or a game to see how far down they can drag the tone and content of this board do a disservice to the patrons and members who make this board what it is.

[/]end rant

[KarlXII]

In fairness to the two patrons who triggered the lockdown, they posted a long series of erotic poses by women who looked and dressed young, but could easily have been of age. But that wasn't enough for them. They mixed in a couple of pictures of actual children in much less erotic poses.
.

Perma-ban them. They should know what is tolerated at the Org, and by their nations, and Orgah nations, laws.

[Samurai Waki]

I know I'm not a big contributor to the thread. But I go over it once and awhile, both guys need to be Temporarily Banned.

Any Future Exchanging of Images of Children for any explicit reason should be Permanently Banned.

[a completely inoffensive name]

In fairness to the two patrons who triggered the lockdown, they posted a long series of erotic poses by women who looked and dressed young, but could easily have been of age. But that wasn't enough for them. They mixed in a couple of pictures of actual children in much less erotic poses.

Clearly they meant to imply pedophilia without actually committing it. I have zero patience for this sort of "let's see how close to the rules we can dance" behavior, and will have none of it. I suspect Hosa feels even more strongly.

Minimal accepted behavior is just that, it is the absolute bottom end of what we will tolerate. If someone thinks it's wicked cool to work that line and see how far they can push, well, this is what happens. In general Orgahs are a thoughtful, tasteful, good-spirited bunch, and that's a big part of why I've hung around for so many years. People who think it's clever or a game to see how far down they can drag the tone and content of this board do a disservice to the patrons and members who make this board what it is.

[/]end rant

Dang, even I am not anywhere near that horrible when it comes to pushing the limit of the rules.
That's just over the line. By a wide margin.

[Vuk]

Well, if this is democratic, my vote is a permanent IP ban. Something like that should not be tolerated for even an instance IMO. Anyone who finds children sexually attractive has to be ed in the head anyway, so I do not see why we would want them here. My.

[Megas Methuselah]

Well, if this is democratic, my vote is a permanent IP ban.

Seconded. And my vote counts as two.

[Rhyfelwyr]

Seconded. And my vote counts as two.

Thirded. But I only get one vote because I'm just a poor Cornish fellow from Vuk's story.

I don't know what was posted, but if what has been said here is true, then a perma-ban is needed straight away.