How is it terrorism when they kill soldiers?

[Askthepizzaguy]

That is why I'm not going to take the higher moral ground. There isn't anything noble about what we are doing there it just needs to be done.

If it isn't noble, then why are we doing it? Why does what need to be done? If the Taliban are the enemy, and we pushed them out of power, isn't our duty simply to aid the Afghan government against the Taliban fighters and get permission from Pakistan to wipe out the last pockets of armed terrorist resistance? There's no need to sit in their nation for decades making no progress. Either get the job done and leave, and do it right, or don't do it at all. And if we don't care about Afghan civilians; why not just carpet bomb them until they are all dead? We're bound to hit Taliban eventually.

To run a legitimate war, you have to care about details like human lives. They aren't just details. I'm not trying to shut you down, but I'm not sure what you're arguing for, if anything; and if you're arguing it in a way I understand. No biggie either way.

[Fragony]

If it isn't noble, then why are we doing it? Why does what need to be done?

Killing these terrorist opponents needs to be done. Because if we don't we will have to it it in 10 years with cosiderably more loss of life.